Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37279981›Full record

ArticleCMAJ open

Impact of COVID-19-related health care disruptions on pathologic cancer staging during the first pandemic year: a retrospective cohort study from March 2018 to March 2021.

Christopher Tran, Lauren E Cipriano, David K Driman

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CMAJ open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christopher TranDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Tran, Driman), London Health Sciences Centre (Tran Driman), Ivey Business School (Cipriano), Western University; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Cipriano), Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont.
Lauren E CiprianoDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Tran, Driman), London Health Sciences Centre (Tran Driman), Ivey Business School (Cipriano), Western University; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Cipriano), Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont.
David K DrimanDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Tran, Driman), London Health Sciences Centre (Tran Driman), Ivey Business School (Cipriano), Western University; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Cipriano), Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont. david.driman@lhsc.on.ca.
Western University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has created major disruptions in cancer care, with reductions in diagnostic tests and treatments. We evaluated the impact of these health care-related changes on cancer staging by comparing cancers staged before and during the pandemic.

methodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study at London Health Sciences Centre and St. Joseph's Health Care London, London, Ontario, Canada. We evaluated all pathologically staged breast, colorectal, prostate, endometrial and lung cancers (the 5 most common cancers by site, excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer) over a 3-year period (Mar. 15, 2018-Mar. 14, 2021). The pre-COVID-19 group included procedures performed between Mar. 15, 2018, and Mar. 14, 2020, and the COVID-19 group included procedures performed between Mar. 15, 2020, and Mar. 14, 2021. The primary outcome was cancer stage group, based on the pathologic tumour, lymph node, metastasis system. We performed univariate analyses to compare demographic characteristics, pathologic features and cancer stage between the 2 groups. We performed multivariable ordinal regression analyses using the proportional odds model to evaluate the association between stage and timing of staging (before v. during the pandemic).

resultsThere were 4055 cases across the 5 cancer sites. The average number of breast cancer staging procedures per 30 days increased during the pandemic compared to the yearly average in the pre-COVID-19 period (41.3 v. 39.6), whereas decreases were observed for endometrial cancer (15.9 v. 16.4), colorectal cancer (21.8 v. 24.3), prostate cancer (13.6 v. 18.5) and lung cancer (11.5 v. 15.9). For all cancer sites, there were no statistically significant differences in demographic characteristics, pathologic features or cancer stage between the 2 groups (

interpretationCancer cases staged during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic were not associated with higher stage; this likely reflects the prioritization of cancer procedures during times of reduced capacity. The impact of the pandemic period on staging procedures varied between cancer sites, which may reflect differences in clinical presentation, detection and treatment.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsCOVID-19Lung NeoplasmsDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasm StagingOntarioPandemicsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID37279981
PMCPMC10263280
OpenAlexW4379535869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.