Regarding 'quantifying alcohol consumption in the general population by analyzing phosphatidylethanol concentration in whole blood: results from 24 574 subjects included in the HUNT study'.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Impact of Sex, Age, Body Composition and Kidney Function on the Relationship Between Self-Reported Alcohol Consumption and Phosphatidylethanol-Data From the HUNT Study.Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology · 2025
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Response to letter to editor for 'Quantifying alcohol consumption in the general population by analyzing phosphatidylethanol concentrations in whole blood: results from 24 574 subjects included in the HUNT4 study'.2023
• Comment on
  Quantifying Alcohol Consumption in the General Population by Analysing Phosphatidylethanol Concentrations in Whole Blood: Results from 24,574 Subjects Included in the HUNT4 Study.2023

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as