Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37279735›Full record

ArticleInterdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery2023

Model-driven survival prediction after congenital heart surgery.

Christoph Zürn, David Hübner, Victoria C Ziesenitz, René Höhn, Lena Schuler, Tim Schlange, Matthias Gorenflo, Fabian A Kari, Johannes Kroll, Tsvetomir Loukanov and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Christoph ZürnDepartment of Congenital Heart Defects and Paediatric Cardiology, University Heart Center Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1762-2490
David HübnerMachine learning for medical applications, Averbis GmbH, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4085-9154
Victoria C ZiesenitzDepartment of Paediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Disease Center for Child and Adolescent Health, Medical Center-University of Heidelberg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2836-4212
René HöhnDepartment of Congenital Heart Defects and Paediatric Cardiology, University Heart Center Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2870-1469
Lena SchulerDepartment of Congenital Heart Defects and Paediatric Cardiology, University Heart Center Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany.
Tim SchlangeFaculty of Psychology, Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany.
Matthias GorenfloDepartment of Paediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Disease Center for Child and Adolescent Health, Medical Center-University of Heidelberg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3326-5959
Fabian A KariDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart Center Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0985-9650
Johannes KrollDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart Center Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany.
Tsvetomir LoukanovDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medical Center-University of Heidelberg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Germany.
Rolf KlemmDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart Center Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8423-1943
Brigitte StillerDepartment of Congenital Heart Defects and Paediatric Cardiology, University Heart Center Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7657-4647
University of Freiburg · DEHeidelberg University · DEAverbis (Germany) · DERuhr University Bochum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe objective of the study was to improve postoperative risk assessment in congenital heart surgery by developing a machine-learning model based on readily available peri- and postoperative parameters.

methodsOur bicentric retrospective data analysis from January 2014 to December 2019 of established risk parameters for dismal outcome was used to train and test a model to predict postoperative survival within the first 30 days. The Freiburg training data consisted of 780 procedures; the Heidelberg test data comprised 985 procedures. STAT mortality score, age, aortic cross-clamp time and postoperative lactate values over 24 h were considered.

resultsOur model showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 94.86%, specificity of 89.48% and sensitivity of 85.00%, resulting in 3 false negatives and 99 false positives.The STAT mortality score and the aortic cross-clamp time each showed a statistically highly significant impact on postoperative mortality. Interestingly, a child's age was barely statistically significant. Postoperative lactate values indicated an increased mortality risk if they were either constantly at a high level or low during the first 8 h postoperatively with an increase afterwards.When considering parameters available before, at the end of and 24 h after surgery, the predictive power of the complete model achieved the highest AUC. This, compared to the already high predictive power alone (AUC 88.9%) of the STAT mortality score, translates to an error reduction of 53.5%.

conclusionsOur model predicts postoperative survival after congenital heart surgery with great accuracy. Compared with preoperative risk assessments, our postoperative risk assessment reduces prediction error by half. Heightened awareness of high-risk patients should improve preventive measures and thus patient safety.

Indexed as

Congenital heart surgeryMachine learningPaediatric intensive careSurvival prediction

Identifiers

PMID37279735
PMCPMC10493173
OpenAlexW4379600993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.