Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37279506›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2023

Genome of the Lord Howe Island Stick Insect Reveals a Highly Conserved Phasmid X Chromosome.

Oliver P Stuart, Rohan Cleave, Michael J L Magrath, Alexander S Mikheyev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. On the Use of the Jackknife to Compare RMolecular ecology resources · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Sex Chromosome Evolution: Hallmarks and Question Marks.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Oliver P StuartResearch School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8815-5829
Rohan CleaveZoos Victoria, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Michael J L MagrathZoos Victoria, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Alexander S MikheyevResearch School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a chromosome-scale genome assembly for Dryococelus australis, a critically endangered Australian phasmid. The assembly, constructed with Pacific Biosciences continuous long reads and chromatin conformation capture (Omni-C) data, is 3.42 Gb in length with a scaffold N50 of 262.27 Mb and L50 of 5. Over 99% of the assembly is contained in 17 major scaffolds, which corresponds to the species' karyotype. The assembly contains 96.3% of insect Benchmarking Unique Single Copy Ortholog genes in single copy. A custom repeat library identified 63.29% of the genome covered by repetitive elements; most were not identifiable based on similarity to sequences in existing databases. A total of 33,793 putative protein-coding genes were annotated. Despite the high contiguity and single-copy Benchmarking Unique Single Copy Ortholog content of the assembly, over 1 Gb of the flow-cytometry-estimated genome size is not represented, likely due to the large and repetitive nature of the genome. We identified the X chromosome with a coverage-based analysis and searched for homologs of genes known to be X-linked across the genus Timema. We found 59% of these genes on the putative X chromosome, indicating strong conservation of X-chromosomal content across 120 million years of phasmid evolution.

Indexed as

ChromosomesInsectaAnimalsAustraliaGene LibraryGenome SizeX Chromosomeconservation geneticslarge genomesphasmidsX chromosome

Identifiers

PMID37279506
PMCPMC10268593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.