Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37279251›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Engaging learners with games-Insights from functional near-infrared spectroscopy.

Melina De Nicolò, Thomas Kanatschnig, Manuel Hons, Guilherme Wood, Kristian Kiili, Korbinian Moeller, Simon Greipl, Manuel Ninaus, Silvia Erika Kober

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Melina De NicolòInstitute of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Thomas KanatschnigInstitute of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-5744-0002
Manuel HonsInstitute of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Guilherme WoodInstitute of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Kristian KiiliFaculty of Education and Culture, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Korbinian MoellerCentre for Mathematical Cognition, School of Science, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom.
Simon GreiplDepartment of Media and Communication, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Manuel NinausInstitute of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-4664-8430
Silvia Erika KoberInstitute of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-1836-2627

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of game elements in learning tasks is thought to facilitate emotional and behavioral responses as well as learner engagement. So far, however, little is known about the underlying neural mechanisms of game-based learning. In the current study, we added game elements to a number line estimation task assessing fraction understanding and compared brain activation patterns to a non-game-based task version. Forty-one participants performed both task versions in counterbalanced order while frontal brain activation patterns were assessed using near-infrared spectroscopy (within-subject, cross-sectional study design). Additionally, heart rate, subjective user experience, and task performance were recorded. Task performance, mood, flow experience, as well as heart rate did not differ between task versions. However, the game-based task-version was rated as more attractive, stimulating and novel compared to the non-game-based task version. Additionally, completing the game-based task version was associated with stronger activation in frontal brain areas generally involved in emotional and reward processing as well as attentional processes. These results provide new neurofunctional evidence substantiating that game elements in learning tasks seem to facilitate learning through emotional and cognitive engagement.

Indexed as

Spectroscopy, Near-InfraredVideo GamesBrainCross-Sectional StudiesHumans

Identifiers

PMID37279251
PMCPMC10243642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.