Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37279239›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

A comparison of the attractiveness of flowering plant blossoms versus attractive targeted sugar baits (ATSBs) in western Kenya.

Nick Yalla, Brian Polo, Daniel P McDermott, Jackline Kosgei, Seline Omondi, Silas Agumba, Vincent Moshi, Bernard Abong'o, John E Gimnig, Angela F Harris and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Science advances · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Nick YallaEntomology Department, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Centre for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya.
Brian PoloEntomology Department, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Centre for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya.
Daniel P McDermottDepartment of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Jackline KosgeiEntomology Department, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Centre for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya.
Seline OmondiEntomology Department, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Centre for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya.
Silas AgumbaEntomology Department, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Centre for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya.
Vincent MoshiEntomology Department, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Centre for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya.
Bernard Abong'oEntomology Department, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Centre for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0002-5038-604X
John E GimnigDivision of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centre for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
Angela F HarrisInnovative Vector Control Consortium, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Julian EntwistleInnovative Vector Control Consortium, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Peter R LongDepartment of Biological and Medical Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Gipsy Lane, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Eric OchomoEntomology Department, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Centre for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0002-4042-4970

Funding

Gates Foundation INV-007509
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attractive Targeted Sugar Baits (ATSB) have been demonstrated to result in significant reductions in malaria vector numbers in areas of scarce vegetation cover such as in Mali and Israel, but it is not clear whether such an effect can be replicated in environments where mosquitoes have a wide range of options for sugar resources. The current study evaluated the attractiveness of the predominant flowering plants of Asembo Siaya County, western Kenya in comparison to an ATSB developed by Westham Co. Sixteen of the most common flowering plants in the study area were selected and evaluated for relative attractiveness to malaria vectors in semi-field structures. Six of the most attractive flowers were compared to determine the most attractive to local Anopheles mosquitoes. The most attractive plant was then compared to different versions of ATSB. In total, 56,600 Anopheles mosquitoes were released in the semi-field structures. From these, 5150 mosquitoes (2621 males and 2529 females) of An. arabiensis, An. funestus and An. gambiae were recaptured on the attractancy traps. Mangifera indica was the most attractive sugar source for all three species while Hyptis suaveolens and Tephrosia vogelii were the least attractive plants to the mosquitoes. Overall, ATSB version 1.2 was significantly more attractive compared to both ATSB version 1.1 and Mangifera indica. Mosquitoes were differentially attracted to various natural plants in western Kenya and ATSB. The observation that ATSB v1.2 was more attractive to local Anopheles mosquitoes than the most attractive natural sugar source indicates that this product may be able to compete with natural sugar sources in western Kenya and suggests this product may have the potential to impact mosquito populations in the field.

Indexed as

AnophelesInsecticidesMagnoliopsidaMalariaAnimalsCarbohydratesFemaleFlowersKenyaMaleMosquito ControlMosquito VectorsSugarsCarbohydratesInsecticidesSugars

Identifiers

PMID37279239
PMCPMC10243617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.