Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37279233›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Prevalence and associated factors of mental health disorders among Brazilian healthcare workers in times of the COVID-19 pandemic: A web-based cross-sectional study.

Silvia Helena Mendonça de Moraes, Inara Pereira da Cunha, Everton Ferreira Lemos, Lesly Lidiane Ledezma Abastoflor, Maria de Lourdes Oshiro, Rosana Teresinha D Orio de Athayde Bohrer, Vicente Sarubbi, Fabrícia Barros de Souza, Débora Dupas Gonçalves do Nascimento, Sandra Maria do Valle Leone de Oliveira

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Silvia Helena Mendonça de MoraesFiocruz Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil.
Inara Pereira da CunhaEscola de Saúde Pública Dr. Jorge David Nasser, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil.
Everton Ferreira LemosUniversidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-6652-9191
Lesly Lidiane Ledezma AbastoflorFiocruz Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil.
Maria de Lourdes OshiroEscola de Saúde Pública Dr. Jorge David Nasser, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil.
Rosana Teresinha D Orio de Athayde BohrerFiocruz Brasilia, Distrito Federal, Brasilia, Brasil.
Vicente SarubbiUniversidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil.
Fabrícia Barros de SouzaFiocruz Brasilia, Distrito Federal, Brasilia, Brasil.
Débora Dupas Gonçalves do NascimentoFiocruz Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil.
Sandra Maria do Valle Leone de OliveiraFiocruz Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-8960-6716
Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública · BREuropean Union of Medical Specialists · BEUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil affected mental health among healthcare workers. To objective of this study was to evaluate the mental health of healthcare workers in in the central-west region of the Brazil, estimating the prevalence of mental health disorders, and investigating associated factors, perceptions of safety, and self-perceptions about mental health in times of the COVID-19 pandemic. The questionnaire was divided into two parts that included general information and perceptions about the work process and identified symptoms using the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21), and multiple linear regression analysis was conducted. A total of 1,522 healthcare workers participated in the survey. Overall prevalence of symptoms was calculated for depression (58.7%), anxiety (59.7%), and stress (61.7%). Physicians had 3.75 times greater risk of depression (1.59-8.85, 95% CI). Independent variables associated with depression symptoms were not feeling safe with the way services were organized (1.12:1.03-1.21, 95% CI) and self-perception of poor mental health (8.06: 4.03-16.10% CI). Working in management was protective, and married professionals had 12% lower risk of exhibiting symptoms of depression (0.79-0.99, 95% CI). Participants with self-perception of poor mental health had 4.63 greater risk for symptoms of anxiety (2.58-8.31, 95% CI). Protective factors were not having sought support for mental health (0.90: 0.82-0.99, 95% CI), having a graduate degree (0.71: 0.54-0.94, 95% CI), and not having been diagnosed with COVID-19 (0.90: 0.83-0.98, 95% CI). Perception of poor mental health was associated with 6.95-fold greater chance of developing stress symptoms. Protective factors from stress were having a degree in dentistry (0.81: 0.68-0.97, 95% CI), residing in Mato Grosso do Sul (0.91: 0.85-0.98, 95% CI), and not having sought mental health support services (0.88: 0.82-0.95, 95% CI). The prevalence of mental health disorders is high among healthcare workers, and is associated with professional category, organization of services provided, and self-perception of poor mental health, reinforcing the need for preventative measures.

Indexed as

COVID-19AnxietyBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionHealth PersonnelHumansInternetMental HealthPandemicsPrevalenceSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID37279233
PMCPMC10243644
OpenAlexW4379536647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.