Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37279185›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2023

Enhancing Renal Tumor Detection: Leveraging Artificial Neural Networks in Computed Tomography Analysis.

Mateusz Glembin, Aleksander Obuchowski, Barbara Klaudel, Bartosz Rydziński, Roman Karski, Paweł Syty, Patryk Jasik, Wojciech Józef Narożański

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mateusz GlembinDepartment of Urology, St. Adalbert's Hospital, COPERNICUS Healthcare Entity, Ltd., Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5527-0014
Aleksander ObuchowskiFaculty of Applied Physics and Mathematics, Gdańsk University of Technology, Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0617-9059
Barbara KlaudelFaculty of Electronics, Telecommunications and Informatics, Gdańsk University of Technology, Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2422-3666
Bartosz RydzińskiFaculty of Applied Physics and Mathematics, Gdańsk University of Technology, Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7742-0228
Roman KarskiFaculty of Applied Physics and Mathematics, Gdańsk University of Technology, Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9804-3399
Paweł SytyFaculty of Applied Physics and Mathematics, Gdańsk University of Technology, Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9719-0861
Patryk JasikFaculty of Applied Physics and Mathematics, Gdańsk University of Technology, Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6601-0506
Wojciech Józef NarożańskiDepartment of Urology, St. Adalbert's Hospital, COPERNICUS Healthcare Entity, Ltd., Gdańsk, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Renal cell carcinoma is one of the most common cancers in Europe, with a total incidence rate of 18.4 cases per 100 000 population. There is currently significant overdiagnosis (11% to 30.9%) at times of planned surgery based on radiological studies. The purpose of this study was to create an artificial neural network (ANN) solution based on computed tomography (CT) images as an additional tool to improve the differentiation of malignant and benign renal tumors and to aid active surveillance. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective study based on CT images was conducted. Axial CT images of 357 renal tumor cases were collected. There were 265 (74.2%) cases histologically proven to be malignant, while 34 (9.5%) cases were benign. Radiologists diagnosed 58 (16.3%) cases as angiomyolipoma (AML), based on characteristic appearance, not confirmed histopathologically. For ANN training, the arterial CT phase images were used. A total of 7207 arterial-phase images were collected, then cropped and added to the database with the associated diagnosis. For the test dataset (ANN validation), 38 cases (10 benign, 28 malignant) were chosen by subgroup randomization to correspond to statistical tumor type distribution. The VGG-16 ANN architecture was used in this study. RESULTS Trained ANN correctly classified 23 out of 28 malignant tumors and 8 out of 10 benign tumors. Accuracy was 81.6% (95% confidence interval, 65.7-92.3%), sensitivity was 82.1% (63.1-93.9%), specificity was 80.0% (44.4-97.5%), and F1 score was 86.8% (74.7-94.5%). CONCLUSIONS The created ANN achieved promising accuracy in differentiating benign vs malignant renal tumors.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsHumansNeural Networks, ComputerRadiopharmaceuticalsRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedRadiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID37279185
PMCPMC10257355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.