Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37279086›Full record

ReviewCBE life sciences education2023

Reading Primary Scientific Literature: Approaches for Teaching Students in the Undergraduate STEM Classroom.

Lara K Goudsouzian, Jeremy L Hsu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in CBE life sciences education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Fostering student authorship skills in synthetic biology.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Teaching Synaptic Transmission Using Primary Literature: A Skills-Focused Pedagogical Approach.Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lara K GoudsouzianDepartment of Biology, DeSales University, Center Valley, PA 18034.
Jeremy L HsuSchmid College of Science and Technology, Chapman University, Orange, CA 92866.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Teaching undergraduate students to read primary scientific literature (PSL) is cited as an important goal for many science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) classes, given a range of cognitive and affective benefits for students who read PSL. Consequently, there are a number of approaches and curricular interventions published in the STEM education literature on how to teach students to read PSL. These approaches vary widely in their instructional methods, target student demographic, required class time, and level of assessment demonstrating the method's efficacy. In this

Indexed as

ReadingStudentsEngineeringHumansMathematicsTeachingTechnology

Identifiers

PMID37279086
PMCPMC10424225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.