Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37279035›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2023

Nanopore Filter: A Method for Counting and Extracting Single DNA Molecules Using a Biological Nanopore.

Asuka Tada, Nanami Takeuchi, Kan Shoji, Ryuji Kawano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Asuka TadaDepartment of Biotechnology and Life Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, 2-24-16 Naka-cho, Koganei, Tokyo 184-8588, Japan.
Nanami TakeuchiDepartment of Biotechnology and Life Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, 2-24-16 Naka-cho, Koganei, Tokyo 184-8588, Japan.
Kan ShojiDepartment of Biotechnology and Life Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, 2-24-16 Naka-cho, Koganei, Tokyo 184-8588, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7198-9683
Ryuji KawanoDepartment of Biotechnology and Life Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, 2-24-16 Naka-cho, Koganei, Tokyo 184-8588, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6523-0649

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper describes a method for the real-time counting and extraction of DNA molecules at the single-molecule level by nanopore technology. As a powerful tool for electrochemical single-molecule detection, nanopore technology eliminates the need for labeling or partitioning sample solutions at the femtoliter level. Here, we attempt to develop a DNA filtering system utilizing an α-hemolysin (αHL) nanopore. This system comprises two droplets, one filling with and one emptying DNA molecules, separated by a planar lipid bilayer containing αHL nanopores. The translocation of DNA through the nanopores is observed by measuring the channel current, and the number of translocated molecules can also be verified by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). However, we found that the issue of contamination seems to be an almost insolvable problem in single-molecule counting. To tackle this problem, we tried to optimize the experimental environment, reduce the volume of solution containing the target molecule, and use the PCR clamp method. Although further efforts are still needed to achieve a single-molecule filter with electrical counting, our proposed method shows a linear relationship between the electrical counting and qPCR estimation of the number of DNA molecules.

Indexed as

NanoporesDNAHemolysin ProteinsLipid BilayersNanotechnologyDNAHemolysin ProteinsLipid Bilayers

Identifiers

PMID37279035
PMCPMC10797584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.