ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2023
Deep learning-based Lorentzian fitting of water saturation shift referencing spectra in MRI.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dynamic glucose-enhanced MRI in brain tumors.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Review
- Enhanced Quantitative Phosphocreatine MR Imaging of Skeletal Muscle Using a Global-Local Two-Branch Deep Learning Model.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Robust Extrapolated Semi-Solid Magnetization Transfer Reference Fitting for Quantitative Amide Proton Transfer Imaging at 3 T: Application to Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment and Mild Dementia.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI for neurodegenerative diseases: An update on clinical and preclinical studies.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Radiofrequency bandwidth effects in direct saturation dynamic glucose enhanced MRI at 3T.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Rapid and simplified post-processing for simultaneousMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer Imaging in Neuroinflammation: Methods, Challenges, and Recommendations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Dynamic glucose enhanced imaging using direct water saturation.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based multi-pool Voigt fitting of CEST, rNOE, and MTC in Z-spectra.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Improving quantification accuracy of a nuclear Overhauser enhancement signal at -1.6 ppm at 4.7 T using a machine learning approach.Physics in medicine and biology · 2025Article
- Enhancing amide proton transfer imaging in ischemic stroke using a machine learning approach with partially synthetic data.NMR in biomedicine · 2025Article
- Motion and magnetic field inhomogeneity correction techniques for chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI: A contemporary review.NMR in biomedicine · 2025Review
- Visualization of Unconjugated Bilirubin In Vivo with a Novel Approach Using Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Rat Model.ACS chemical neuroscience · 2024Article
- Deep learning for dense Z-spectra reconstruction from CEST images at sparse frequency offsets.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWater saturation shift referencing (WASSR) Z-spectra are used commonly for field referencing in chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI. However, their analysis using least-squares (LS) Lorentzian fitting is time-consuming and prone to errors because of the unavoidable noise in vivo. A deep learning-based single Lorentzian Fitting Network (sLoFNet) is proposed to overcome these shortcomings.
methodsA neural network architecture was constructed and its hyperparameters optimized. Training was conducted on a simulated and in vivo-paired data sets of discrete signal values and their corresponding Lorentzian shape parameters. The sLoFNet performance was compared with LS on several WASSR data sets (both simulated and in vivo 3T brain scans). Prediction errors, robustness against noise, effects of sampling density, and time consumption were compared.
resultsLS and sLoFNet performed comparably in terms of RMS error and mean absolute error on all in vivo data with no statistically significant difference. Although the LS method fitted well on samples with low noise, its error increased rapidly when increasing sample noise up to 4.5%, whereas the error of sLoFNet increased only marginally. With the reduction of Z-spectral sampling density, prediction errors increased for both methods, but the increase occurred earlier (at 25 vs. 15 frequency points) and was more pronounced for LS. Furthermore, sLoFNet performed, on average, 70 times faster than the LS-method.
conclusionComparisons between LS and sLoFNet on simulated and in vivo WASSR MRI Z-spectra in terms of robustness against noise and decreased sample resolution, as well as time consumption, showed significant advantages for sLoFNet.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.