Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37279008›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2023

Deep learning-based Lorentzian fitting of water saturation shift referencing spectra in MRI.

Sajad Mohammed Ali, Nirbhay N Yadav, Ronnie Wirestam, Munendra Singh, Hye-Young Heo, Peter C van Zijl, Linda Knutsson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Dynamic glucose-enhanced MRI in brain tumors.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Rapid and simplified post-processing for simultaneousMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sajad Mohammed AliDepartment of Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4707-8206
Nirbhay N YadavRussell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0802-9791
Ronnie WirestamDepartment of Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Munendra SinghRussell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Hye-Young HeoRussell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7297-2015
Peter C van ZijlRussell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9706-1066
Linda KnutssonDepartment of Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4263-113X
Kennedy Krieger Institute · USLund University · SE

Funding

Sleep and Circadian Dysfunction, Brain and Neurobehavioral Development in AutismP50HD103538 · NICHD · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI S. Ali Fatemi, Bradley L Schlaggar · 2020 to 2026
$9.9M
TRD 4: Platforms for multi-modal and multi-scale imaging dataP41EB031771 · NIBIB · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI Hanzhang Lu, Peter CM Van Zijl · 2021 to 2026
$9.9M
Development and Translation of D-glucose as a Diagnostic Agent for MRI of CancerR01EB019934 · NIBIB · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI VAN ZIJL, PETER CM · 2015 to 2019
$5.7M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB031771NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB019934NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103538NIH HHS RO1 EB019934
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWater saturation shift referencing (WASSR) Z-spectra are used commonly for field referencing in chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI. However, their analysis using least-squares (LS) Lorentzian fitting is time-consuming and prone to errors because of the unavoidable noise in vivo. A deep learning-based single Lorentzian Fitting Network (sLoFNet) is proposed to overcome these shortcomings.

methodsA neural network architecture was constructed and its hyperparameters optimized. Training was conducted on a simulated and in vivo-paired data sets of discrete signal values and their corresponding Lorentzian shape parameters. The sLoFNet performance was compared with LS on several WASSR data sets (both simulated and in vivo 3T brain scans). Prediction errors, robustness against noise, effects of sampling density, and time consumption were compared.

resultsLS and sLoFNet performed comparably in terms of RMS error and mean absolute error on all in vivo data with no statistically significant difference. Although the LS method fitted well on samples with low noise, its error increased rapidly when increasing sample noise up to 4.5%, whereas the error of sLoFNet increased only marginally. With the reduction of Z-spectral sampling density, prediction errors increased for both methods, but the increase occurred earlier (at 25 vs. 15 frequency points) and was more pronounced for LS. Furthermore, sLoFNet performed, on average, 70 times faster than the LS-method.

conclusionComparisons between LS and sLoFNet on simulated and in vivo WASSR MRI Z-spectra in terms of robustness against noise and decreased sample resolution, as well as time consumption, showed significant advantages for sLoFNet.

Indexed as

Deep LearningWaterAlgorithmsImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingWaterdeep learningleast squaresLorentzian fittingWASSRZ-spectra

Identifiers

PMID37279008
PMCPMC10524193
OpenAlexW4379509086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.