Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37278999›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2023

Effect of a Peer Health Coaching Intervention on Clinical Outcomes Among US Veterans With Cardiovascular Risks: The Vet-COACH Randomized Clinical Trial.

Karin M Nelson, Leslie Taylor, Jennifer L Williams, Mayuree Rao, Kristen E Gray, Charles Bradley Kramer, Eric Epler, Tiffanie Fennell

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02697422 (Vet COACH), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02697422 nacompletednot on this map

Vet COACH (Veteran Peer Coaches Optimizing and Advancing Cardiac Health)

TypeinterventionalSponsorVA Office of Research and DevelopmentRan2017 to 2023Enrolled264ConditionsCardiovascular Disease (CVD), Hypertension, Hyperlipemia, ObesityArmsCommunity-based peer health coach intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Karin M NelsonHealth Services Research and Development Center of Innovation, Veterans Affairs (VA) Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.
Leslie TaylorHealth Services Research and Development Center of Innovation, Veterans Affairs (VA) Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.
Jennifer L WilliamsHealth Services Research and Development Center of Innovation, Veterans Affairs (VA) Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.
Mayuree RaoHealth Services Research and Development Center of Innovation, Veterans Affairs (VA) Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.
Kristen E GrayHealth Services Research and Development Center of Innovation, Veterans Affairs (VA) Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.
Charles Bradley KramerHealth Services Research and Development Center of Innovation, Veterans Affairs (VA) Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.
Eric EplerHealth Services Research and Development Center of Innovation, Veterans Affairs (VA) Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.
Tiffanie FennellGeneral Internal Medicine Service, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Although cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in the US, CVD risk factors remain suboptimally controlled. Objective: To test the effectiveness of a home-visit, peer health coaching intervention to improve health outcomes for veterans with multiple CVD risks. Design, Setting, and Participants: This 2-group, unblinded randomized clinical trial, called Vet-COACH (Veteran Peer Coaches Optimizing and Advancing Cardiac Health), used a novel geographic-based method to recruit a racially diverse population of veterans with low income. These veterans were enrolled at the Seattle or American Lake Veterans Health Affairs primary care clinics in Washington state. Veterans with a diagnosis of hypertension with at least 1 blood pressure reading of 150/90 mm Hg or higher in the past year, and 1 other CVD risk factor (current smoker, overweight or obesity, and/or hyperlipidemia), who resided in Census tracts with the highest prevalence of hypertension were eligible to participate. Participants were randomized to the intervention group (n = 134) or control group (n = 130). An intention-to-treat analysis was performed from May 2017 to October 2021. Intervention: Participants in the intervention group received peer health coaching for 12 months with mandatory and optional educational materials, an automatic blood pressure monitor, a scale, a pill organizer, and healthy nutrition tools. Participants in the control group received usual care plus educational materials. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a change in systolic blood pressure (SBP) from baseline to 12-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included change in health-related quality of life (HRQOL; measured using the 12-item Short Form survey's Mental Component Summary and Physical Component Summary scores), Framingham Risk Score, and overall CVD risk and health care use (hospitalizations, emergency department visits, and outpatient visits). Results: The 264 participants who were randomized (mean [SD] age of 60.6 [9.7] years) were predominantly male (229 [87%]) and 73 (28%) were Black individuals and 103 (44%) reported low annual income (<$40 000 per year). Seven peer health coaches were recruited. No difference was found in change in SBP between the intervention and control groups (-3.32 [95% CI, -6.88 to 0.23] mm Hg vs -0.40 [95% CI, -4.20 to 3.39] mm Hg; adjusted difference in differences, -2.05 [95% CI, -7.00 to 2.55] mm Hg; P = .40). Participants in the intervention vs control group reported greater improvements in mental HRQOL scores (2.19 [95% CI, 0.26-4.12] points vs -1.01 [95% CI, -2.91 to 0.88] points; adjusted difference in differences, 3.64 [95% CI, 0.66-6.63] points; P = .02). No difference was found in physical HRQOL scores, Framingham Risk Scores, and overall CVD risk or health care use. Conclusions and Relevance: This trial found that, although the peer health coaching program did not significantly decrease SBP, participants who received the intervention reported better mental HRQOL compared with the control group. The results suggest that a peer-support model that is integrated into primary care can create opportunities for well-being improvements beyond blood pressure control. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02697422.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesHypertensionMentoringVeteransChildFemaleHumansMaleQuality of LifeUnited States

Identifiers

PMID37278999
PMCPMC10245194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.