Observational studyGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2023
Structure-function associations between contrast sensitivity and widefield swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography in diabetic macular edema.
Observational study in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Contrast Sensitivity Impairment in Diabetic Retinopathy: Clinical and Structural Correlates.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Structure-Function Associations Between Quantitative Contrast Sensitivity Function And Peripapillary Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Diabetic Retinopathy.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Reduced contrast sensitivity function and outer retina thickness in convalescent Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease.Eye (London, England) · 2025Article
- Bibliometric analysis of ophthalmic OCT and OCT angiography research trends over the past 20 years.International ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Impaired Visual Function in Posterior Vitreous Detachment Assessed With the Active-Learning Quantitative Contrast Sensitivity Function Test.Journal of vitreoretinal diseasesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the relationship between contrast sensitivity (CS) and widefield swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography (WF SS-OCTA) vascular metrics in diabetic macular edema (DME) was the purpose.
methodsThis prospectively enrolled cross-sectional observational study included 61 eyes of 48 patients that were tested with the quantitative CS function (qCSF) test on the same day as imaging with WF SS-OCTA (PLEX® Elite 9000, Carl Zeiss Meditec) 3 × 3, 6 × 6, and 12 × 12 mm scans. Outcomes included visual acuity (VA) and multiple qCSF metrics. Vascular metrics included vessel density (VD) and vessel skeletonized density (VSD) in the superficial (SCP) and deep capillary plexus (DCP) and whole retina (WR) and foveal avascular zone (FAZ) parameters. Mixed effects multivariable linear regression models controlling for age, lens status, and diabetic retinopathy stage were performed. Standardized beta coefficients were calculated by refitting the standardized data.
resultsSS-OCTA metrics had a significant association with CS and VA. The effect size of OCTA metrics was larger on CS compared to VA. For example, the standardized beta coefficients for VSD and CS at 3 cpd (β
conclusionStructure-function associations in patients with DME leveraging the qCSF device suggest microvascular changes on WF SS-OCTA are associated with larger changes in contrast sensitivity than VA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.