ArticleJAMA2023
The Volume and Cost of Quality Metric Reporting.
Article in JAMA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed.
- Medical Record Abstraction for Quality Improvement in Sepsis Care Using Artificial Intelligence: A Cluster Randomized Trial.JAMA network open · 2026Trial
- Mandatory Value-Based Payment Programs and Hospital Administrative Costs.JAMA health forum · 2026Article
- Are the Best Worth the Wait? Physician Quality Scores and Access Delays.Health services research · 2026Article
- Development and external validation of a text-matching algorithm to identify patients with lower extremity deep venous thrombosis from radiology reports at five medical centers.Thrombosis research · 2026Article
- Welcome to the jungle: collection and evaluation of quality indicators with the QUALICATOR instrument.BMJ quality & safety · 2026Article
- Article
- Reevaluating Internal Thoracic Artery Use in Octogenarians Undergoing Multivessel Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2026Article
- The Interface of Artificial Intelligence and the Electronic Medical Record in Orthopaedic Surgery: Current Applications and Future Directions.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2026Review
- Federal inspection timing, not compliance, associated with nursing home post-disaster outcomes.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
- Using generative artificial intelligence in clinical practice: a narrative review and proposed agenda for implementation.The Medical journal of Australia · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence for Cardiovascular Care in Action: From Learning to Implementation in Health Systems.JACC. Advances · 2025Review
- OphthoACR (Ophthalmology Automated Chart Review): An AI-Powered Tool for Complete Automation of Ophthalmology Chart Reviews and Cohort Data Analysis.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- Accuracy of Large Language Models to Identify Stroke Subtypes Within Unstructured Electronic Health Record Data.Stroke · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Care Quality for Atrial Fibrillation Across Non-Interoperable Electronic Health Record Data using a Retrieval-Augmented Generation-enabled Large Language Model.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Calculating Value in Hand and Wrist Care: A Systematic Review on the Current Literature.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2025Article
- External validation of current quality care metrics after radical nephroureterectomy.BJU international · 2025Article
- Association of early in-hospital endotracheal intubation with clinical outcomes in patients with traumatic coma: a multicenter observational study.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Observational
- Reconsidering the Cancer Center Accreditation Model.JAMA oncology · 2025Article
- Noninterruptive tool to support provider malnutrition documentation and minimize documentation queries.JAMIA open · 2025Article
- From Intensification to Optimization: Balancing Efficacy, Safety, and Costs in High-Risk Localized Soft Tissue Sarcomas.Cancers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: US hospitals report data on many health care quality metrics to government and independent health care rating organizations, but the annual cost to acute care hospitals of measuring and reporting quality metric data, independent of resources spent on quality interventions, is not well known. Objective: To evaluate externally reported inpatient quality metrics for adult patients and estimate the cost of data collection and reporting, independent of quality-improvement efforts. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective time-driven activity-based costing study at the Johns Hopkins Hospital (Baltimore, Maryland) with hospital personnel involved in quality metric reporting processes interviewed between January 1, 2019, and June 30, 2019, about quality reporting activities in the 2018 calendar year. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes included the number of metrics, annual person-hours per metric type, and annual personnel cost per metric type. Results: A total of 162 unique metrics were identified, of which 96 (59.3%) were claims-based, 107 (66.0%) were outcome metrics, and 101 (62.3%) were related to patient safety. Preparing and reporting data for these metrics required an estimated 108 478 person-hours, with an estimated personnel cost of $5 038 218.28 (2022 USD) plus an additional $602 730.66 in vendor fees. Claims-based (96 metrics; $37 553.58 per metric per year) and chart-abstracted (26 metrics; $33 871.30 per metric per year) metrics used the most resources per metric, while electronic metrics consumed far less (4 metrics; $1901.58 per metric per year). Conclusions and Relevance: Significant resources are expended exclusively for quality reporting, and some methods of quality assessment are far more expensive than others. Claims-based metrics were unexpectedly found to be the most resource intensive of all metric types. Policy makers should consider reducing the number of metrics and shifting to electronic metrics, when possible, to optimize resources spent in the overall pursuit of higher quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.