Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37278772›Full record

ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2023

Vaccine Acceptance During a Novel Student-led Emergency Department COVID-19 Vaccination Program.

Carly Eastin, Brendan Moore, Aaron Moulton, Luke Lefler, Fuad Haydar, Morgan Sweere, Gavin Jones, Crystal Sparks, Austin Porter, M Kathryn Allison and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Carly EastinUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Brendan MooreUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Aaron MoultonUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Luke LeflerUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Fuad HaydarUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Morgan SweereUniversity of Florida, College of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida.
Gavin JonesUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Department of Pharmacy and Therapeutics, and College of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Crystal SparksUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Austin PorterUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, College of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management; Arkansas Department of Health, Little Rock, Arkansas.
M Kathryn AllisonUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, College of Public Health, Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Travis EastinUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Little Rock, Arkansas.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic not only exacerbated barriers to healthcare but has also highlighted the trend toward increased vaccine hesitancy. Our goal was to improve COVID-19 vaccine uptake through a student-led, emergency department-based (ED) vaccination program.

methodsThis prospective, quality-improvement pilot program used medical and pharmacy student volunteers as COVID-19 vaccine screeners in a southern, urban, academic ED. Patients eligible for vaccination were offered either the Janssen-Johnson & Johnson or the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine and were educated about vaccine concerns. Vaccine acceptance rates were recorded, as well as reasons for vaccine hesitancy, vaccine brand preferences, and demographics. The primary and secondary quantitative outcomes were overall vaccine acceptance and change in vaccine acceptance after student-provided education, respectively. We performed logistic regression to identify potential variables that correlated with vaccine acceptance. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, focus group interviews with four key stakeholder groups explored implementation facilitators and barriers.

resultsWe screened 406 patients for COVID-19 vaccination eligibility and current vaccine status, the majority of whom were unvaccinated. Of unvaccinated or partially vaccinated patients, vaccine acceptance before education was 28.3% (81/286), and vaccine acceptance after education was 31.5% (90/286) (% difference, 3.1% [95% CI 0.3%-5.9%], P=0.03). The most common hesitancy factors cited were concerns about side effects and safety. Results from the regression analysis indicated that increasing age and Black race were associated with an increased odds of vaccine acceptance. Focus groups revealed implementation barriers, including patient resistance and workflow issues, and facilitators, including student involvement and public health promotion.

conclusionUsing medical and pharmacy student volunteers as COVID-19 vaccine screeners was successful, and brief education provided by the students led to a modest increase in vaccine acceptance, with overall acceptance of 31.5%. Numerous educational benefits are described.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesEmergency Service, HospitalHumansProspective StudiesStudentsVaccinationBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesVaccines

Identifiers

PMID37278772
PMCPMC10284509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.