ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2023
Status quo of advanced cancer patients participating in shared decision-making in China: a mixed study.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- A mixed methods systematic review of cancer treatment decision-making in vulnerable populations.Patient education and counseling · 2026Pooled it
- The burdens, coping strategies, and unmet needs of family caregivers of Chinese patients with lymphoma receiving commercial CAR-T-cell therapy: A qualitative study.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2026Article
- Lessons from the field: culturally grounded approaches to recruiting Chinese American immigrant cancer patients to psycho-oncology trials.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Clinical decision-making frameworks for pandemic preparedness and response: A scoping review.Health promotion perspectives · 2025Review
- Translation and validation of the Chinese version of the adolescent and young adult psycho-oncology screening tool.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2025Article
- Patient participation and its determinants based on the Social Ecological Model: a cross-sectional study in North China.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Shared decision-making in urinary reconstruction among radical cystectomy patients: a thematic analysis of patient and provider perspectives in China.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- The Experience of Caring for Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Patients From the Perspective of Haematology Nurses: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.Nursing open · 2025Article
- Congruence of cancer patients' desired and achieved decision-making roles between self, doctor and family: a cross-sectional multi-site survey.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Shared Decision-Making Behavior in Surgery Among Early Breast Cancer Patients and Associated Factors Using COM-B Model: A Latent Profile Analysis.Journal of nursing management · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposePatients with advanced cancer are usually willing to participate in shared decision-making (SDM), but in clinical practice, patient participation is easily ignored. This study aimed to analyze the current SDM status of advanced cancer patients and related factors.
methodsIn quantitative research, we administered a cross-sectional survey to 513 advanced cancer patients in 16 tertiary hospitals in China. A sociodemographic information questionnaire, the Control Preference Scale (CPS), and Perceived-Involvement in Care Scale (PICS) were used to analyze current SDM status and influencing factors. Our qualitative research was based on the Ottawa Decision Support Framework (ODSF), and 17 advanced cancer patients were interviewed to explore their perceptions of SDM.
resultsOur quantitative results show that patients' actual and expected decision-making participation differed; statistically significant influencing factors were age, insurance, and whether patients were worried about the therapeutic effects. We also found that dynamic decision-making mode changes, disease information acquisition, decision-making participation obstacles, and family members' roles affected patients' SDM through qualitative interviews.
conclusionAdvanced cancer patients' SDM in China is dominated by sharing and continuously fluctuates. Influenced by Chinese traditional culture, family members play an important role in SDM. In clinical work, we should pay attention to the dynamic changes in patients' participation in decision-making and the role of family members.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37278769What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.