ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2023
Comparative Study of Molecular Mechanics Force Fields for β-Peptidic Foldamers: Folding and Self-Association.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- An ATP-Mediated Antibiotic β-Peptide Nanofiber That Kills Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria via a Multistage Mechanism.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Parametrization of βJournal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Sanguinarine and Doxorubicin Inhibit Heat Shock Protein HSPA5 and Trigger ER Stress in Breast Cancer.Cell biochemistry and biophysics · 2026Article
- Molecular dynamics as a tool for unveiling protein-like folding behavior in urethane-based macromolecules: the effect of chain length on the secondary structure of oligourethanes.Polymer chemistry · 2025Article
- ILVES: Accurate and Efficient Bond Length and Angle Constraints in Molecular Dynamics.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- In situ captured antibacterial action of membrane-incising peptide lamellae.Nature communications · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Computer-assisted study and design of non-natural peptidomimetics is increasingly important in the development of novel constructs with widespread applicability. Among these methods, molecular dynamics can accurately describe monomeric as well as oligomeric states of these compounds. We studied seven different sequences composed of cyclic and acyclic β-amino acids, the closest homologues of natural peptides, and compared the performance on them of three force field families in which specific modifications were made to improve reproduction of β-peptide structures. Altogether 17 systems were simulated, each for 500 ns, testing multiple starting conformations and in three cases also oligomer formation and stability from eight β-peptide monomers. The results indicated that our recently developed CHARMM force field extension, based on torsional energy path matching of the β-peptide backbone against quantum-chemical calculations, performs best overall, reproducing the experimental structures accurately in all monomeric simulations and correctly describing all the oligomeric examples. The Amber and GROMOS force fields could only treat some of the seven peptides (four in each case) without further parametrization. Amber was able to reproduce the experimental secondary structure of those β-peptides which contained cyclic β-amino acids, while the GROMOS force field had the lowest performance in this sense. From the latter two, Amber was able to hold together already formed associates in the prepared state but was not able to yield spontaneous oligomer formation in the simulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.