Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37278434›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open ophthalmology2023

Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for uveitis.

Nima Ghadiri, Ian R Reekie, Iris Gordon, Sare Safi, Gareth Lingham, Jennifer R Evans, Stuart Keel

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Clinical Roles of Infectious Diseases Specialists in Ophthalmology.Infectious diseases & clinical microbiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 9 countries.

Nima Ghadiri *Department of Ophthalmology, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK nima.ghadiri@nhs.net.ORCID 0000-0001-5591-2419
Ian R Reekie *Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Iris GordonCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Sare SafiOphthalmic Epidemiology Research Center, Research Institute for Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Gareth LinghamCentre for Eye Research Ireland, Technological University Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-8957-0733
Jennifer R EvansCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast UK, Belfast, UK.
Stuart KeelDepartment of Noncommunicable Diseases, Vision and Blindness Prevention Programme, World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6756-348X
Queen's University Belfast · GBLions Eye Institute · AUShahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBWorld Health Organization - Pakistan · PK

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To facilitate the integration of eye care into universal health coverage, the WHO is developing a Package of Eye Care Interventions (PECI). Development of the PECI involves the identification of evidence-based interventions from relevant clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for uveitis.A systematic review of CPGs published on uveitis between 2010 and March 2020 was conducted. CPGs passing title and abstract and full-text screening were evaluated using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) tool and data on recommended interventions extracted using a standard data extraction sheet.Of 56 CPGs identified as potentially relevant from the systematic literature search, 3 CPGs underwent data extraction following the screening stages and appraisal with the AGREE II tool. These CPGs covered screening for, monitoring and treating juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA)-associated uveitis, the use of adalimumab and dexamethasone in treating non-infectious uveitis, and a top-level summary of assessment, differential diagnosis and referral recommendations for uveitis, aimed at primary care practitioners. Many of the recommendations were based on expert opinion, though some incorporated clinical study and randomised controlled trial data.There is currently sparse coverage of the spectrum of disease caused by uveitis within CPGs. This may partially be due to the large number of conditions with diverse causes and clinical presentations covered by the umbrella term uveitis, which makes numerous sets of guidelines necessary. The limited pool of CPGs to select from has implications for clinicians seeking guidance on clinical care strategies for uveitis.

Indexed as

Arthritis, JuvenileUveitisAdalimumabHumansAdalimumabEpidemiologyInflammationPublic healthRetinaTreatment MedicalTreatment other

Identifiers

PMID37278434
PMCPMC9827242
OpenAlexW4313557391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.