SynthesisJournal of anatomy2023
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of the retrotransverse foramen of the atlas.
Synthesis in Journal of anatomy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of the retrotransverse foramen of the atlas.Journal of anatomy · 2023Pooled it
- Determination of the prevalence of complete type retrotransverse and arcuate foramen of the atlas using three-dimensional computed tomography images.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The retrotransverse foramen (RTF) is a nonmetric variant of the atlas vertebra that can accommodate an anastomotic vertebral vein and occipital nerve. An understanding of this variation and its occurrence is crucial, as it could aid in explanation of the unidentified cause of the high prevalence of variability in this region. The aim of this meta-analysis was to obtain data on the prevalence of the RTF and its variations according to anatomy, sex, and ethnicity. A large-scale search was conducted through the major online databases to establish and determine the pool of studies reporting data relevant to the RTF. No date or language restrictions were applied. The data collection was categorized by prevalence, type (incomplete/complete), side, sex, ethnicity, laterality, and diameter. A total of 17 studies (n = 1979 subjects) were incorporated into our analysis. The overall pooled prevalence for a complete RTF was 11.4% and the overall pooled prevalence of an incomplete (partial) RTF was 9.6%. A complete RTF was most prevalent in Africa (Sub-Saharan population) (12.1%), followed by Europe (11.8%) and Asia (9.7%). As this variant occurs in a significant number of patients in all of the aforementioned populations, recognition, and awareness, especially with thorough investigation with computer tomography angiography (CTA) should be implemented, as it is the only possible way to visualize the possible contents of RTF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.