Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37277847›Full record

ArticleBiology of sex differences2023

Breast cancer: the first comparative evaluation of oncobiome composition between males and females.

Elena Niccolai, Simone Baldi, Giulia Nannini, Francesca Gensini, Laura Papi, Vania Vezzosi, Simonetta Bianchi, Lorenzo Orzalesi, Matteo Ramazzotti, Amedeo Amedei

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology of sex differences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Mammary Gland Microbiota in Benign Breast Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Interactions between the tumor microbiota and breast cancer.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elena NiccolaiDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy. elena.niccolai@unifi.it.
Simone BaldiDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Giulia NanniniDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Francesca GensiniDepartment of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Laura PapiDepartment of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Vania VezzosiDivision of Pathological Anatomy, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Simonetta BianchiDivision of Pathological Anatomy, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Lorenzo OrzalesiDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Matteo Ramazzotti *Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Amedeo Amedei *Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy. amedeo.amedei@unifi.it.ORCID 0000-0002-6797-9343
University of Florence · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmerging evidence suggests that breast microbiota dysbiosis contributes to cancer initiation, progression, prognosis and treatment efficacy. Anyway, available data are referred only to female patients, and studies on males are completely missing. Male breast cancer (MBC) is 70-100 times less frequent, but the mortality rate adjusted to incidence is higher in men than in females. Currently, MBC diagnostic approaches and treatments have generally been extrapolated from the clinical experience gained in women, while few studies focus on characterizing male cancer biology. Taking into account the rising importance of the oncobiome field and the need of MBC targeted studies, we explored the breast cancer oncobiome of male and female patients.

methods16S rRNA gene sequencing was performed in 20 tumor and 20 non-pathological adjacent FFPE breast tissues from male and female patients.

resultsWe documented, for the first time, the presence of a sexually dimorphic breast-associated microbiota, here defined as "breast microgenderome". Moreover, the paired analysis of tumor and non-pathological adjacent tissues suggests the presence of a cancer-associated dysbiosis in male patients, with surrounding tissue conserving a healthier microbiome, whereas in female patients, the entire breast tissue is predisposed to cancer development. Finally, the phylum Tenericutes, especially the genera Mesoplasma and Mycobacterium, could to be involved in breast carcinogenesis, in both sexes, deserving further investigation, not only for its role in cancer development but even as potential prognostic biomarker.

conclusionsBreast microbiota characterization can enhance the understanding of male breast cancer pathogenesis, being useful for detection of new prognostic biomarkers and development of innovative personalized therapies, remarking the relevant gender differences.

Indexed as

Breast Neoplasms, MaleMicrobiotaNeoplasmsDysbiosisFemaleHumansMaleRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16SBreast cancerDimorphismFFPEGenderMicrobiotaOncobiome

Identifiers

PMID37277847
PMCPMC10243058
OpenAlexW4379472385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.