ArticleBMC ophthalmology2023
Human cornea thermo-viscoelastic behavior modelling using standard linear solid model.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Relationship Between Scheimpflug-Based Ocular Biomechanics and Myopia Progression in Adolescents.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Impact of material property modifications on optical performance: a multidisciplinary study in the human eye under different intraocular pressures.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Safety evaluation after LASIK surgery based on the linear creep property: a finite element analysis.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCorneal biomechanics is of great interest to researchers recently. Clinical findings relate them to corneal diseases and to outcomes of refractive surgery. To have a solid understanding of corneal diseases' progression, it is important to understand corneal biomechanics. Also, they are essential for better explaining outcomes of refractive surgeries and their undesired consequences. There is a difficulty for studying corneal biomechanics in-vivo and multiple limitations arise for ex-vivo studies. Hence mathematical modelling is considered as a proper solution to overcome such obstacles. Mathematical modelling of cornea in-vivo allows studying corneal viscoelasticity with taking into consideration all boundary conditions existing in real in-vivo situation.
methodsThree mathematical models are used to simulate corneal viscoelasticity and thermal behavior in two different loading situations: constant and transient loading. Two models of the three are used for viscoelasticity simulation which are Kelvin-Voigt and standard linear solid models. Also, temperature rise due to the ultrasound pressure push is calculated using bioheat transfer model for both the axial direction and as a 2D spatial map using the third model (standard linear solid model).
resultsViscoelasticity simulation results show that standard linear solid model is efficient for describing the viscoelastic behavior of human cornea in both loading conditions. Results show also that the deformation amplitude obtained from standard linear solid model is more reasonable for corneal soft-tissue deformation with respect to corresponding clinical findings than that obtained from Kelvin-Voigt model. Thermal behavior results estimated corneal temperature rise to be roughly 0.2 °C, which conforms with FDA regulations for soft tissue safety.
conclusionStandard Linear Solid (SLS) model is better describing the human corneal behavior in response to constant and transient load more efficiently. Temperature rise (TR) for the corneal tissue of about 0.2 °C is conforming with FDA regulations and even less than the FDA regulations for soft tissue safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.