Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37277678›Full record

SynthesisDrug safety2023

Factors Associated with Underreporting of Adverse Drug Reactions by Health Care Professionals: A Systematic Review Update.

Patricia García-Abeijon, Catarina Costa, Margarita Taracido, Maria Teresa Herdeiro, Carla Torre, Adolfo Figueiras

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Drug safety, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Patricia García-AbeijonDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Farmacy, University of Santiago de Compostela, Praza do Seminario de Estudos Galegos, s/n, 15705, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Catarina CostaFaculdade de Farmácia da, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-8247-0422
Margarita TaracidoDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Farmacy, University of Santiago de Compostela, Praza do Seminario de Estudos Galegos, s/n, 15705, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1243-8352
Maria Teresa HerdeiroDepartment of Medical Sciences, Institute of Biomedicine-iBiMED, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-0500-4049
Carla TorreFaculdade de Farmácia da, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-5542-9993
Adolfo FigueirasDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Farmacy, University of Santiago de Compostela, Praza do Seminario de Estudos Galegos, s/n, 15705, Santiago de Compostela, Spain. adolfo.figueiras@usc.es.ORCID 0000-0002-5766-8672

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUnderreporting is a major limitation of the voluntary reporting system of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). A 2009 systematic review showed the knowledge and attitudes of health professionals were strongly related with underreporting of ADRs.

objectiveOur aim was to update our previous systematic review to determine factors (sociodemographic, knowledge and attitudes) associated with the underreporting of ADRs by healthcare professionals.

methodsWe searched the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases for studies published between 2007 and 2021 that met the following inclusion criteria: (1) published in English, French, Portuguese or Spanish; (2) involving health professionals; and (3) the goal was to evaluate factors associated with underreporting of ADRs through spontaneous reporting.

resultsOverall, 65 papers were included. While health professional sociodemographic characteristics did not influence underreporting, knowledge and attitudes continue to show a significant effect: (1) ignorance (only serious ADRs need to be reported) in 86.2%; (2) lethargy (procrastination, lack of interest, and other excuses) in 84.6%; (3) complacency (the belief that only well tolerated drugs are allowed on the market) in 46.2%; (4) diffidence (fear of appearing ridiculous for reporting merely suspected ADRs) in 44.6%; and (5) insecurity (it is nearly impossible to determine whether or not a drug is responsible for a specific adverse reaction) in 33.8%, and the absence of feedback in 9.2%. In this review, the non-obligation to reporting and confidentiality emerge as new reasons for underreporting.

conclusionsAttitudes regarding the reporting of adverse reactions continue to be the main determinants of underreporting. Even though these are potentially modifiable factors through educational interventions, minimal changes have been observed since 2009. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number CRD42021227944.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsAttitude of Health PersonnelHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelHumansPharmacovigilance

Identifiers

PMID37277678
PMCPMC10279571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.