Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37277572›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2023

Early experience with resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta for unstable pelvic fractures in the Republic of Korea: a multi-institutional study.

Dong Hun Kim, Jonghwan Moon, Sung Wook Chang, Byung Hee Kang

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Assessing the role of REBOA in the management of hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. REBOA in trauma: a life-saving intervention or a spectacular failure?European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dong Hun KimDivision of Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6613-6902
Jonghwan MoonDivision of Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, Ajou School of Medicine, 164 Worldcup-Ro, Yeongtong-Gu, Suwon-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, 16499, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1655-0440
Sung Wook ChangDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2689-3068
Byung Hee KangDivision of Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, Ajou School of Medicine, 164 Worldcup-Ro, Yeongtong-Gu, Suwon-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, 16499, Republic of Korea. kbhname@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3204-3251
Ajou University · KRDankook University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRecently, trauma centers in the Republic of Korea introduced resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) for application in severe pelvic fracture cases. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of REBOA and its associated factors in enhancing survival.

methodsData from patients with severe pelvic injuries at two regional trauma centers from 2016 to 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were dichotomized into REBOA and no-REBOA groups, and patient characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared using 1:1 propensity score matching. Additional survival-based analysis was performed in the REBOA group.

resultsREBOA was performed in 42 of the 174 patients with pelvic fractures. As patients in the REBOA group had more severe injuries than did patients in the no-REBOA group, 1:1 propensity score matching was performed to adjust for severity. After matching, 24 patients were included in each group and mortality was not significantly different (REBOA 62.5% vs. no-REBOA 41.7%, P = 0.149). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no significant differences in mortality between the two matched groups (log-rank test, P = 0.408). Among the 42 patients treated with REBOA, 14 survived. Shorter REBOA duration (63 [40-93] vs. 166 [67-193] min, P = 0.015) and higher systolic blood pressure before REBOA (65 [58-76] vs. 54 [49-69] mmHg, P = 0.035) were associated with better survival.

conclusionsThe effectiveness of REBOA has not been definitively established; however, it was not associated with increased mortality in this study. Additional studies are required to better understand how REBOA can be effectively used for treatment.

Indexed as

Balloon OcclusionEndovascular ProceduresFractures, BoneShock, HemorrhagicAortaHumansInjury Severity ScoreResuscitationRetrospective StudiesBalloon occlusionPelvic bonesResuscitationTrauma centersTreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID37277572
OpenAlexW4379390920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.