Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37277569›Full record

ArticleProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2024

Modulatory Effect of Competitive Exclusion on the Transmission of ESBL E. coli in Chickens.

Amera F Ebrahem, Azza S El-Demerdash, Rania M Orady, Nehal M Nabil

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Avian PathogenicVeterinary sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A NovelAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Hexagonal zinc oxide nanoparticles: a novel approach to combat multidrug-resistantFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Amera F EbrahemAgricultural Research Center, Reference Laboratory for Veterinary Quality Control On Poultry Production, Animal Health Research Institute, P.O. 12618, Gamasa, Egypt.
Azza S El-DemerdashAgriculture Research Center (ARC), Animal Health Research Institute (AHRI), P.O. 44516, Zagazig, Egypt. dr.azzasalah@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0825-9776
Rania M OradyAgricultural Research Center, Reference Laboratory for Veterinary Quality Control On Poultry Production, Animal Health Research Institute, P.O. 12618, Gamasa, Egypt.
Nehal M NabilAgricultural Research Center, Reference Laboratory for Veterinary Quality Control On Poultry Production, Animal Health Research Institute, P.O. 12618, Gamasa, Egypt.
Agricultural Research Center · EGAnimal Health Research Institute · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extensive use of antimicrobial agents in broiler farms causes the emergence of antimicrobial resistance of E. coli producing severe economic losses to the poultry industry; therefore, monitoring the transmission of ESBL E. coli is of great significance throughout broiler farms. For this reason, we investigated the efficiency of competitive exclusion (CE) products to control the excretion and transmission of ESBL-producing E. coli in broiler chickens. Three hundred samples from 100 broiler chickens were screened for the incidence of E. coli by standard microbiological techniques. The overall isolation percentage was 39% and differentiated serologically into ten different serotypes: O158, O128, O125, O124, O91, O78, O55, O44, O2, and O1. The isolates represented absolute resistance to ampicillin, cefotaxime, and cephalexin. The effectiveness of CE (commercial probiotic product; Gro2MAX) on ESBL-producing E. coli (O78) isolate transmission and excretion was studied in vivo. The results showed that the CE product has interesting properties, making it an excellent candidate for targeted drug delivery by inhibiting bacterial growth and downregulating biofilm, adhesins, and toxin-associated genes loci. The histopathological findings demonstrated the capability of CE in repairing internal organ tissues. Our outcomes suggested that the administration of CE (probiotic products) in broiler farms could be a safe and alternative approach to control the transmission of ESBL-producing virulent E. coli in broiler chickens.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesChickensEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsPoultry DiseasesProbioticsAnimalsAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesAnti-virulence propertyBroiler chickenCompetitive exclusionEscherichia coliExtended-spectrum β-lactamases

Identifiers

PMID37277569
PMCPMC11126521
OpenAlexW4379508484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.