Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37277485›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2023

Defining and using immune archetypes to classify and treat cancer.

Alexis J Combes, Bushra Samad, Matthew F Krummel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Moving Beyond Morphology: Toward a Morpho-Molecular Classification of Pleural Mesothelioma.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexis J CombesDepartment of Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. alexis.combes@ucsf.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9110-6542
Bushra SamadDepartment of Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2893-0897
Matthew F KrummelDepartment of Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. matthew.krummel@ucsf.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7915-3533

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumours are surrounded by a host immune system that can suppress or promote tumour growth. The tumour microenvironment (TME) has often been framed as a singular entity, suggesting a single type of immune state that is defective and in need of therapeutic intervention. By contrast, the past few years have highlighted a plurality of immune states that can surround tumours. In this Perspective, we suggest that different TMEs have 'archetypal' qualities across all cancers - characteristic and repeating collections of cells and gene-expression profiles at the level of the bulk tumour. We discuss many studies that together support a view that tumours typically draw from a finite number (around 12) of 'dominant' immune archetypes. In considering the likely evolutionary origin and roles of these archetypes, their associated TMEs can be predicted to have specific vulnerabilities that can be leveraged as targets for cancer treatment with expected and addressable adverse effects for patients.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsHumansTumor Microenvironment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.