Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37277428›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Universal mtDNA fragment for Cervidae barcoding species identification using phylogeny and preliminary analysis of machine learning approach.

Ewa Filip, Tomasz Strzała, Edyta Stępień, Danuta Cembrowska-Lech

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ewa FilipInstitute of Biology, University of Szczecin, Wąska 13, 71-415, Szczecin, Poland. ewa.filip@usz.edu.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2313-8398
Tomasz StrzałaDepartment of Genetics, Faculty of Biology and Animal Science, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Wrocław, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7761-1630
Edyta StępieńInstitute of Marine and Environmental Sciences, University of Szczecin, Adama Mickiewicza 16, 70-383, Szczecin, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5638-7676
Danuta Cembrowska-LechInstitute of Biology, University of Szczecin, Wąska 13, 71-415, Szczecin, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1503-0064
University of Szczecin · PLWrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the study was to use total DNA obtained from bone material to identify species of free-living animals based on the analysis of mtDNA fragments by molecular methods using accurate bioinformatics tools Bayesian approach and the machine learning approach. In our research, we present a case study of successful species identification based on degraded samples of bone, with the use of short mtDNA fragments. For better barcoding, we used molecular and bioinformatics methods. We obtained a partial sequence of the mitochondrial cytochrome b (Cytb) gene for Capreolus capreolus, Dama dama, and Cervus elaphus, that can be used for species affiliation. The new sequences have been deposited in GenBank, enriching the existing Cervidae mtDNA base. We have also analysed the effect of barcodes on species identification from the perspective of the machine learning approach. Machine learning approaches of BLOG and WEKA were compared with distance-based (TaxonDNA) and tree-based (NJ tree) methods based on the discrimination accuracy of the single barcodes. The results indicated that BLOG and WEKAs SMO classifier and NJ tree performed better than TaxonDNA in discriminating Cervidae species, with BLOG and WEKAs SMO classifier performing the best.

Indexed as

DeerDNA, MitochondrialAnimalsBayes TheoremDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicMachine LearningPhylogenyDNA, Mitochondrial

Identifiers

PMID37277428
PMCPMC10241948
OpenAlexW4379471848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.