Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37277275›Full record

Trial reportEuropean urology2023

Rucaparib for the Treatment of Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Associated with a DNA Damage Repair Gene Alteration: Final Results from the Phase 2 TRITON2 Study.

Wassim Abida, David Campbell, Akash Patnaik, Alan H Bryce, Jeremy Shapiro, Richard M Bambury, Jingsong Zhang, John M Burke, Daniel Castellano, Albert Font and 20 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in European urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02952534 (TRITON2), which is not on this map. Cited by 70 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
19.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02952534 phase2completednot on this map

TRITON2: A Multicenter, Open-label Phase 2 Study of Rucaparib in Patients With Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Associated With Homologous Recombination Deficiency

TypeinterventionalSponsorpharmaand GmbHRan2017 to 2021Enrolled277ConditionsMetastatic Castration Resistant Prostate CancerArmsRucaparib
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A Phase II Trial of Niraparib in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Harboring Pathogenic Variants in ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, and CHEK2.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Cambridge Neoadjuvant Cancer of the Prostate (CANCAP03): A Window Study into the Effects of Olaparib ± Degarelix in Primary Prostate Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Immune Spatial Organization Predicts Distant Metastasis Risk in Aggressive Localized Prostate Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Emerging Therapeutic Strategies in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer.Journal of immunotherapy and precision oncology · 2026
    Review

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 20 institutions in 10 countries.

Wassim AbidaGenitourinary Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: abidam@mskcc.org.
David CampbellBarwon Health, University Hospital Geelong, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Akash PatnaikUniversity of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Alan H BryceMayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Jeremy ShapiroCabrini Hospital, Malvern, Victoria, Australia.
Richard M BamburyCork University Hospital, Wilton, Cork, Ireland.
Jingsong ZhangH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
John M BurkeRocky Mountain Cancer Centers and US Oncology Research, Denver, CO, USA.
Daniel CastellanoUniversity Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Albert FontInstitut Català d'Oncologia, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain.
Vinod GanjuHudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Anne-Claire Hardy-BessardCARIO HPCA, Plérin, France.
Ray McDermottAdelaide and Meath Hospital (Incorporating the National Children's Hospital), Dublin, Ireland.
Brieuc SautoisMedical Oncology, University Hospital of Liège, CHU Sart Tilman, Liège, Belgium.
Dominique SpaethCentre d'Oncologie de Gentilly, Nancy, France.
Eric VoogClinique Victor Hugo Centre Jean Bernard, Le Mans, France.
Josep M PiulatsInstitut Català d'Oncologia, Barcelona, Spain.
Elias PintusGuy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust Hospital, London, UK.
Charles J RyanUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Axel S MerseburgerUniversity Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany.
Gedske DaugaardCopenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Axel HeidenreichUniversitätsklinikum Köln, Cologne, Germany; Department of Urology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Karim FizaziInstitut Gustave Roussy, University of Paris Saclay, Villejuif Cedex, France.
Andrea LoehrClovis Oncology, Inc., Boulder, CO, USA.
Darrin DespainClovis Oncology, Inc., Boulder, CO, USA.
Andrew D SimmonsClovis Oncology, Inc., Boulder, CO, USA.
Melanie DowsonClovis Oncology UK, Ltd., Cambridge, UK.
Jowell GoClovis Oncology, Inc., Boulder, CO, USA.
Simon P WatkinsClovis Oncology UK, Ltd., Cambridge, UK.
Simon ChowdhuryGuy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust Hospital, London, UK.
Clovis Oncology (United States) · USClovis Oncology (United Kingdom) · GBGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBInstitut Català d'Oncologia · ESBarwon Health · AUCabrini Hospital · AUCentre d’Investigation Clinique Innovation Technologique de Nancy · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège · BECentre Jean Bernard · FRCopenhagen University Hospital · DKCork University Hospital · IEHudson Institute of Medical Research · AUMayo Clinic Hospital · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USMoffitt Cancer Center · USResearch Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre · ESRocky Mountain Cancer Centers · USTallaght University Hospital · IEUniversité Paris-Saclay · FRUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DE

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
SPORE In Prostate CancerP50CA092629 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Yu Chen, MICHAEL J MORRIS · 2001 to 2026
$63.0M
Targeting FOXA1-downstream pathways: a novel therapeutic strategy for castration-resistant prostate cancerP50CA180995 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI ABDULKADIR, SARKI A., HUSSAIN, MAHA H · 2015 to 2025
$19.9M
Targeting the cGAS/STING Pathway to Overcome Resistance to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in PTEN-deficient Prostate CancerR01CA273914 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI PATNAIK, AKASH · 2022 to 2025
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P50 CA092629NCI NIH HHS P50 CA180995NCI NIH HHS R01 CA273914
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInitial TRITON2 (NCT02952534) results demonstrated the efficacy of rucaparib 600 mg BID in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) associated with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA) or other DNA damage repair (DDR) gene alteration.

objectiveTo present the final data from TRITON2. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsTRITON2 enrolled patients with mCRPC who had progressed on one or two lines of next-generation androgen receptor-directed therapy and one taxane-based chemotherapy. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR; as per the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor Version 1.1/Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3 criteria in patients with measurable disease by independent radiology review [IRR]); prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate (≥50% decrease from baseline [PSA50]) was a key secondary endpoint. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: As of July 27, 2021 (study closure), TRITON2 had enrolled 277 patients, grouped by mutated gene: BRCA (n = 172), ATM (n = 59), CDK12 (n = 15), CHEK2 (n = 7), PALB2 (n = 11), or other DDR gene (Other; n = 13). ORR by IRR was 46% (37/81) in the BRCA subgroup (95% confidence interval [CI], 35-57%), 100% (4/4) in the PALB2 subgroup (95% CI, 40-100%), and 25% (3/12) in the Other subgroup (95% CI, 5.5-57%). No patients within the ATM, CDK12, or CHEK2 subgroups had an objective response by IRR. PSA50 response rates (95% CI) in the BRCA, PALB2, ATM, CDK12, CHEK2, and Other subgroups were 53% (46-61%), 55% (23-83%), 3.4% (0.4-12), 6.7% (0.2-32%), 14% (0.4-58%), and 23% (5.0-54%), respectively.

conclusionsThe final TRITON2 results confirm the clinical benefit and manageable safety profile of rucaparib in patients with mCRPC, including those with an alteration in BRCA or select non-BRCA DDR gene. PATIENT SUMMARY: Almost half of TRITON2 patients with BRCA-mutated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer had a complete or partial tumor size reduction with rucaparib; clinical benefits were also observed with other DNA damage repair gene alterations.

Indexed as

Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantDNA DamageGenes, BRCA2HumansIndolesMaleIndolesrucaparibDNA damage repair gene alterationMetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancerPoly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID37277275
PMCPMC10527050
OpenAlexW4379203214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.