Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37277195›Full record

ReviewBMJ global health2023

Factors, enablers and challenges for COVID-19 vaccine development.

Jean-Louis Excler, Melanie Saville, Lois Privor-Dumm, Sarah Gilbert, Peter J Hotez, Didi Thompson, Salim Abdool-Karim, Jerome H Kim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ global health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Enhancing Clinical Trial Sites in Low- and Middle-Income Countries to Facilitate Product Development in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. How Can We Prevent a Resurgence of Vaccine Nationalism?International journal of health policy and management · 2025
    Article
  20. Scrutinizing the COVID-19 vaccine safety debate.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jean-Louis ExclerDirector General's Office, International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of) JeanLouis.Excler@ivi.int.ORCID 0000-0002-6462-5101
Melanie SavilleVaccine Development, Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, London, UK.
Lois Privor-DummInternational Vaccine Access Center, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9807-2544
Sarah GilbertNuffield Department of Medicine, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
Peter J HotezTexas Children's Hospital Center for Vaccine Development, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8770-1042
Didi ThompsonWorld Innovation Summit for Health (WISH), Qatar Foundation, Doha, Qatar.
Salim Abdool-KarimDepartment of Epidemiology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Jerome H KimDirector General's Office, International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic triggered a sense of vulnerability and urgency that led to concerted actions by governments, funders, regulators and industry to overcome traditional challenges for the development of vaccine candidates and to reach authorisation. Unprecedented financial investments, massive demand, accelerated clinical development and regulatory reviews were among the key factors that contributed to accelerating the development and approval of COVID-19 vaccines. The rapid development of COVID-19 vaccines benefited of previous scientific innovations such as mRNA and recombinant vectors and proteins. This has created a new era of vaccinology, with powerful platform technologies and a new model for vaccine development. These lessons learnt highlight the need of strong leadership, to bring together governments, global health organisations, manufacturers, scientists, private sector, civil society and philanthropy, to generate innovative, fair and equitable access mechanisms to COVID-19 vaccines for populations worldwide and to build a more efficient and effective vaccine ecosystem to prepare for other pandemics that may emerge. With a longer-term view, new vaccines must be developed with incentives to build expertise for manufacturing that can be leveraged for low/middle-income countries and other markets to ensure equity in innovation, access and delivery. The creation of vaccine manufacturing hubs with appropriate and sustained training, in particular in Africa, is certainly the way of the future to a new public health era to safeguard the health and economic security of the continent and guarantee vaccine security and access, with however the need for such capacity to be sustained in the interpandemic period.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesCOVID-19 VaccinesEcosystemHumansPandemicsCOVID-19 VaccinesVaccinesCOVID-19Health economicsHealth policyImmunisationVaccines

Identifiers

PMID37277195
PMCPMC10255030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.