Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37276470›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs (Project Hope)2023

Evaluating Medicaid Managed Care Network Adequacy Standards And Associations With Specialty Care Access For Children.

Ju-Chen Hu, Janet R Cummings, Xu Ji, Adam S Wilk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs (Project Hope), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ju-Chen HuJu-Chen Hu (jhu62@emory.edu), Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Janet R CummingsJanet R. Cummings, Emory University.
Xu JiXu Ji, Emory University and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia.
Adam S WilkAdam S. Wilk, Emory University.

Funding

Multi-level Factors that Influence Dialysis Facilities' Assessments of Patient Suitability for TransplantationK01DK128384 · NIDDK · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI WILK, ADAM STEVEN · 2021 to 2025
$744k
NIDDK NIH HHS K01 DK128384
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medicaid managed care plans cover more than 80 percent of Medicaid-enrolled children, including many children with special health care needs (CSHCN). Federal rules require states to set network adequacy standards to improve specialty care access for Medicaid managed care enrollees. Using a quasi-experimental design and 2016-19 National Survey of Children's Health data, we examined the association between quantitative network adequacy standards and access to specialty care among 8,614 Medicaid-enrolled children, including 3,157 with special health care needs, in eighteen states. Outcomes included whether the child had any visit to non-mental health specialists, any visit to mental health professionals, or any unmet health care needs and whether the caregiver ever felt frustrated in getting services for the child in the past year. We observed no association between the adoption of any quantitative network adequacy standard and the above outcomes among Medicaid-enrolled children. Among CSHCN, however, adopting any quantitative standard was positively associated with caregivers feeling frustrated in getting services for the child, especially among CSHCN who visited non-mental health specialists. Without additional interventions, adopting new network adequacy standards may have unintended consequences for CSHCN.

Indexed as

Children with DisabilitiesMedicineChildHealth Services AccessibilityHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansManaged Care ProgramsMedicaidUnited States

Identifiers

PMID37276470
PMCPMC10706697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.