Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37276425›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2023

Historical plant introductions predict current insect invasions.

Aymeric Bonnamour, Rachael E Blake, Andrew M Liebhold, Helen F Nahrung, Alain Roques, Rebecca M Turner, Takehiko Yamanaka, Cleo Bertelsmeier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A roadmap to key traits of invasive Drosophilidae.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Insect Brain Proteomics: A Case Study of Periplaneta americana.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Alien ants spreading through Europe:Biodiversity data journal · 2024
    Article
  13. Historical plant introductions predict current insect invasions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aymeric BonnamourDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7548-5837
Rachael E BlakeIntertidal Agency, San Francisco, CA 94104-5401.ORCID 0000-0003-0847-9100
Andrew M LiebholdNorthern Research Station, Forest Service, US Department of Agriculture, Morgantown, WV 26505.ORCID 0000-0001-7427-6534
Helen F NahrungForest Industries Research Centre, University of the Sunshine Coast, Buderim, QLD 4556, Australia.
Alain RoquesInstitut National de la Recherche Agronomique, UR 0633, Zoologie Forestière, 4575 Orléans, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3734-3918
Rebecca M TurnerScion (New Zealand Forest Research Institute), Christchurch 8440, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-7885-3092
Takehiko YamanakaResearch Center for Agricultural Information Technology, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, 305-8517 Tsukuba, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2888-1076
Cleo BertelsmeierDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3624-1300

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thousands of insect species have been introduced outside of their native ranges, and some of them strongly impact ecosystems and human societies. Because a large fraction of insects feed on or are associated with plants, nonnative plants provide habitat and resources for invading insects, thereby facilitating their establishment. Furthermore, plant imports represent one of the main pathways for accidental nonnative insect introductions. Here, we tested the hypothesis that plant invasions precede and promote insect invasions. We found that geographical variation in current nonnative insect flows was best explained by nonnative plant flows dating back to 1900 rather than by more recent plant flows. Interestingly, nonnative plant flows were a better predictor of insect invasions than potentially confounding socioeconomic variables. Based on the observed time lag between plant and insect invasions, we estimated that the global insect invasion debt consists of 3,442 region-level introductions, representing a potential increase of 35% of insect invasions. This debt was most important in the Afrotropics, the Neotropics, and Indomalaya, where we expect a 10 to 20-fold increase in discoveries of new nonnative insect species. Overall, our results highlight the strong link between plant and insect invasions and show that limiting the spread of nonnative plants might be key to preventing future invasions of both plants and insects.

Indexed as

InsectaIntroduced SpeciesAnimalsPlantsinvasion debtnonnative insectsnonnative plantsspecies flowtime lag

Identifiers

PMID37276425
PMCPMC10268304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.