Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37276394›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2023

Sensory and motor representations of internalized rhythms in the cerebellum and basal ganglia.

Masashi Kameda, Koichiro Niikawa, Akiko Uematsu, Masaki Tanaka

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Consensus Paper: Models of Cerebellar Functions.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Chimeric Music Reveals an Interaction of Pitch and Time in Electrophysiological Signatures of Music Encoding.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Comparison of Signals from Cerebellar Purkinje Cells and Deep Nuclei during Temporal Prediction in Primates.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Neural pathways underlying the production of pitch and rhythm in aphasia.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Temporal Information Processing in the Cerebellum and Basal Ganglia.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Sensory and motor representations of internalized rhythms in the cerebellum and basal ganglia.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Masashi KamedaDepartment of Physiology, Hokkaido University School of Medicine, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan.
Koichiro NiikawaDepartment of Physiology, Hokkaido University School of Medicine, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9958-5867
Akiko UematsuDepartment of System Neuroscience, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, Okazaki 444-8585, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1167-4022
Masaki TanakaDepartment of Physiology, Hokkaido University School of Medicine, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6177-1314
Hokkaido University · JPNational Institute for Physiological Sciences · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both the cerebellum and basal ganglia are involved in rhythm processing, but their specific roles remain unclear. During rhythm perception, these areas may be processing purely sensory information, or they may be involved in motor preparation, as periodic stimuli often induce synchronized movements. Previous studies have shown that neurons in the cerebellar dentate nucleus and the caudate nucleus exhibit periodic activity when the animals prepare to respond to the random omission of regularly repeated visual stimuli. To detect stimulus omission, the animals need to learn the stimulus tempo and predict the timing of the next stimulus. The present study demonstrates that neuronal activity in the cerebellum is modulated by the location of the repeated stimulus and that in the striatum (STR) by the direction of planned movement. However, in both brain regions, neuronal activity during movement and the effect of electrical stimulation immediately before stimulus omission were largely dependent on the direction of movement. These results suggest that, during rhythm processing, the cerebellum is involved in multiple stages from sensory prediction to motor control, while the STR consistently plays a role in motor preparation. Thus, internalized rhythms without movement are maintained as periodic neuronal activity, with the cerebellum and STR preferring sensory and motor representations, respectively.

Indexed as

Basal GangliaCerebellumAnimalsCaudate NucleusCerebellar NucleiCorpus StriatumMovementcaudate nucleuscerebellar dentate nucleusnonhuman primaterhythm perceptiontemporal prediction

Identifiers

PMID37276394
PMCPMC10268275
OpenAlexW4379469182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.