ArticleFrontiers in immunology2023
Production of monoclonal antibody of heat-labile toxin A subunit to identify enterotoxigenic
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Enterotoxigenic Objective: For the development of an ETEC vaccine, we attempted to construct a peptide-specific monoclonal antibody library against heat-labile enterotoxin A subunit (LT-A) by epitope mapping using synthetic peptides. Methods: Sera produced by five mice immunized with recombinant LT-A protein were examined for specific recognition with synthetic 15-mer and 34-mer peptides of LT-A proteins using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The analysis revealed that the synthetic peptides number 8, 16, 24, 33, 36, 38, and 39 reacted with an anti-LT-A polyclonal antibody. For the possible prediction of LT-A epitopes, each full-length protein sequence was subjected to BCPreds analysis and three-dimensional protein structure analysis. The data showed that three peptides (synthetic peptide numbers: 33, 36, and 38-39) have identical antigenic specificities with LT-A protein, suggesting the usefulness of these linear peptide epitopes. Results: Based on these peptides, we produced monoclonal antibodies to improve the specificity of LT-A detection. Monoclonal antibodies produced from two peptides (numbers 33 and 36) showed affinity for an LT-A recombinant antigen. Moreover, peptide epitope prediction analysis showed that the sites of the three peptides were identical to those exhibiting actual antigenicity. Also, it was confirmed that the amino acid sequence that actually showed antigenicity was included in the peptide predicted only by ETEC-LT-A-33. Also, the specificity of the antibody for ETEC-LT-A-33 was validated using bacterial cells, and the neutralizing effect of the antibody was determined by assessing cytokine release in infected HCT-8 cells. Conclusion: The monoclonal antibodies produced in this study are useful toolsfor vaccine production against ETEC and can be used to identify peptide antigencandidates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.