Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37275712›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2023

The contribution of anthropology to the study of Open Dialogue: ethnographic research methods and opportunities.

David Mosse, Darren Baker, Molly Carroll, Liana Chase, Ruth Kloocke, Kiara Wickremasinghe, Bethan Cramer, Keira Pratt-Boyden, Milena Wuerth

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

David MosseDepartment of Anthropology and Sociology, SOAS University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Darren BakerBarnet, Enfield and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Molly CarrollBarnet, Enfield and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Liana ChaseDepartment of Anthropology, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom.
Ruth KloockeBarnet, Enfield and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Kiara WickremasingheDepartment of Anthropology and Sociology, SOAS University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Bethan CramerDevon Partnership NHS Trust, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Keira Pratt-BoydenDepartment of Anthropology and Sociology, SOAS University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Milena WuerthDepartment of Anthropology and Sociology, SOAS University of London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When Open Dialogue diversifies internationally as an approach to mental healthcare, so too do the research methodologies used to describe, explain and evaluate this alternative to existing psychiatric services. This article considers the contribution of anthropology and its core method of ethnography among these approaches. It reviews the methodological opportunities in mental health research opened up by anthropology, and specifically the detailed knowledge about clinical processes and institutional contexts. Such knowledge is important in order to generalize innovations in practice by identifying contextual factors necessary to implementation that are unknowable in advance. The article explains the ethnographic mode of investigation, exploring this in more detail with an account of the method of one anthropological study under way in the UK focused on Peer-Supported Open Dialogue (POD) in the National Health Service (NHS). It sets out the objectives, design and scope of this research study, the varied roles of researchers, the sites of field research and the specific interaction between ethnography and Open Dialogue. This study is original in its design, context, conduct and the kind of data produced, and presents both opportunities and challenges. These are explained in order to raise issues of method that are of wider relevance to Open Dialogue research and anthropology.

Indexed as

anthropologyethnographymental healthOpen Dialoguepracticespsychiatry implementationresearch methods psychiatry

Identifiers

PMID37275712
PMCPMC10237270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.