Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37275658›Full record

ArticleJournal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls2023

Frailty as a risk-stratification tool in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS).

Aalam Sohal, Hunza Chaudhry, Isha Kohli, Kirti Arora, Jay Patel, Nimrat Dhillon, Ishandeep Singh, Dino Dukovic, Marina Roytman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Aalam SohalDepartment of Hepatology, Liver Institute Northwest, Seattle, USA.
Hunza ChaudhryDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, Fresno, USA.
Isha KohliDepartment of Public Health, Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, New York, USA.
Kirti AroraDayanand Medical College and Hospital, India.
Jay PatelDepartment of Internal Medicine, Orange Park Medical Center, Orange Park, Florida, USA.
Nimrat DhillonShri Guru Ram Das Medical College, India.
Ishandeep SinghDayanand Medical College and Hospital, India.
Dino DukovicRoss University School of Medicine, Barbados, USA.
Marina RoytmanDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California, San Francisco, Fresno, USA.
Dayanand Medical College & Hospital · INUniversity of California, San Francisco · USArk Medical Center · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USRoss University School of Medicine · BBSeattle University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The concept of frailty has gained importance, especially in patients with liver disease. Our study systematically investigated the effect of frailty on post-procedural outcomes in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). Methods: We used National Inpatient Sample(NIS) 2016-2019 data to identify patients who underwent TIPS. Hospital frailty risk score (HFRS) was used to classify patients as frail (HFRS>=5) and non-frail (HFRS<5). The relationship between frailty and outcomes such as death, post-procedural shock, non-home discharge, length of stay (LOS), post-procedural LOS, and total hospitalization charges (THC) was assessed. Results: A total of 13,700 patients underwent TIPS during 2016-2019. Of them, 5,995 (43.76%) patients were frail, while 7,705 (56.24%) were non-frail. There were no significant differences between the two groups based on age, gender, race, insurance, and income. Frail patients had higher mortality (15.18% vs. 2.07%, p<0.001), a higher incidence of non-home discharge (53.38% vs. 19.08%, p<0.001), a longer overall LOS (12.5 days vs. 3.35,p<0.001), longer post-procedural stay (8.2 days vs. 3.4 days, p<0.001), and higher THC ($240,746.7 vs. $121,763.1, p<0.001) compared to the non-frail patients. On multivariate analysis, frail patients had a statistically significant higher risk of mortality (aOR-3.22, 95% CI-1.98- 5.00, p<0.001). Conclusion: Frailty assessment can be beneficial in risk stratification in patients undergoing TIPS.

Indexed as

CirrhosisEmergingFrailtyNational Inpatient SampleTIPS

Identifiers

PMID37275658
PMCPMC10233326
OpenAlexW4379508998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.