Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37275476›Full record

ArticleNeotropical biodiversity2023

What constitutes a community? A co-occurrence exploration of the Costa Rican avifauna.

Mélusine F Velde, Elizabeth M Besozzi, Billi A Krochuk, Kate M Henderson, Brian R Tsuru, Sara Velásquez Restrepo, Holly M Garrod, Jacob C Cooper

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neotropical biodiversity, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Mélusine F VeldeDivision of Birds, Negaunee Integrative Research Center, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3363-5427
Elizabeth M BesozziDepartment of Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8531-1742
Billi A KrochukBiodiversity Research Centre and Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8865-9018
Kate M HendersonDepartment of Environmental Biology, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2865-8667
Brian R TsuruSchool of Environment and Natural Resources, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7817-4102
Sara Velásquez RestrepoDepartamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad EAFIT, Medellín, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-9072-922X
Holly M GarrodBirdsCaribbean, Natick, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2851-7610
Jacob C CooperDivision of Birds, Negaunee Integrative Research Center, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2182-3236
American Museum of Natural History · USState University of New York · USThe Ohio State University · USUniversidad EAFIT · COUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of Oklahoma · USVillanova University · US

Funding

U of Kansas/Haskell Indian Nations U.IRACDA ProjectK12GM063651 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI DE GUZMAN, ROBERTO N · 2002 to 2022
$10.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS K12 GM063651
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concept of a "community" as a form of organization for natural biological systems is both widespread and widely accepted within the ecological and biological sciences. Communities have been defined as groups of organisms that interact in ways that denote interdependence between individuals and taxa (e.g. as defined by "food webs") but they have also been defined as groups of co-occurring organisms that are assumed to interact by virtue of their shared spatiotemporal existence. The latter definition has been debated and challenged in the literature, with mounting evidence for co-occurrence being more indicative of coincident ecological niches in space and time rather than being evidence of ecological interaction or dependency. Using a dataset of 460 Costa Rican bird species divided into breeding and non-breeding season datasets, we empirically demonstrate the ways in which co-occurrence can create illusory communities based on similar occupied ecological niches and similar patterns of co-occurrence at different times of year. We discuss the importance of discerning coincidental co-occurrence from true ecological interactions that would manifest a true community, and further address the importance of differentiating communities of co-occurrence from communities of demonstrable ecological interaction. While co-occurrence is a necessary aspect of interspecific interactions, we discuss and demonstrate here that such co-occurrence does not make a community, nor should explicit patterns of co-occurrence be seen as evidence for evolutionarily important ecological interactions.

Indexed as

community assemblycommunity turnoverco-occurrenceEcological niche modelingneutral theory

Identifiers

PMID37275476
PMCPMC10237366
OpenAlexW4367173706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.