ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023
How to communicate with patients in written asynchronous online conversations: an intervention study with undergraduate medical students in a cross-over design.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The patient-physician encounter is the core element in the treatment of patients and the diagnosis of disease. In these times of digitalization, patient-physician communication is increasingly taking place online: patients embrace new possibilities offered digitally, and physicians are encouraged to adapt accordingly. Since a huge part of online communication is written, this study aims to investigate how medical students communicate with patients online by focusing on their written competencies and whether an intervention might improve their competencies. Methods: This study was performed in an explanatory cross-sectional manner with a cross-over design. Second-year medical students participated. An intervention was developed on how to formulate an appropriate written response to a patient's request and integrated a longitudinal communication class. The intervention consists of education on general set-up (e.g., greetings), syntax, spelling, content and kind of communication (e.g., appreciative attitude). After meeting a patient in a simulated role play medical students received the patient's request via a digital platform. The control group had the same simulated role play and the same task but they received the intervention on communication afterwards. Intervention and control group were statistically compared based on a checklist. Results: Twenty-nine medical students took part in the study. The results showed that the medical students had basic competencies in dealing with written communication independent if they received the intervention (CG: M = 3.86 ± 1.23 vs. IG: M = 4.07 ± 1.03; Discussion: Intervention on basic competencies such as simple language and clear presentation might not be needed as an integral part in medical education. However, medical students should learn how to present empathic and authentic behavior in written online communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.