Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37275257›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023

Improved multi-trait prediction of wheat end-product quality traits by integrating NIR-predicted phenotypes.

Shiva Azizinia, Daniel Mullan, Allan Rattey, Jayfred Godoy, Hannah Robinson, David Moody, Kerrie Forrest, Gabriel Keeble-Gagnere, Matthew J Hayden, Josquin Fg Tibbits and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Shiva AziziniaAgriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.
Daniel MullanInterGrain, Bibra Lake, WA, Australia.
Allan RatteyInterGrain, Bibra Lake, WA, Australia.
Jayfred GodoyInterGrain, Bibra Lake, WA, Australia.
Hannah RobinsonInterGrain, Bibra Lake, WA, Australia.
David MoodyInterGrain, Bibra Lake, WA, Australia.
Kerrie ForrestAgriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.
Gabriel Keeble-GagnereAgriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.
Matthew J HaydenAgriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.
Josquin Fg TibbitsAgriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.
Hans D DaetwylerAgriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Historically, end-product quality testing has been costly and required large flour samples; therefore, it was generally implemented in the late phases of variety development, imposing a huge cost on the breeding effort and effectiveness. High genetic correlations of end-product quality traits with higher throughput and nondestructive testing technologies, such as near-infrared (NIR), could enable early-stage testing and effective selection of these highly valuable traits in a multi-trait genomic prediction model. We studied the impact on prediction accuracy in genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) of adding NIR-predicted secondary traits for six end-product quality traits (crumb yellowness, water absorption, texture hardness, flour yield, grain protein, flour swelling volume). Bread wheat lines (1,400-1,900) were measured across 8 years (2012-2019) for six end-product quality traits with standard laboratory assays and with NIR, which were combined to generate predicted data for approximately 27,000 lines. All lines were genotyped with the Infinium™ Wheat Barley 40K BeadChip and imputed using exome sequence data. End-product and NIR phenotypes were genetically correlated (0.5-0.83, except for flour swelling volume 0.19). Prediction accuracies of end-product traits ranged between 0.28 and 0.64 and increased by 30% through the inclusion of NIR-predicted data compared to single-trait analysis. There was a high correlation between the multi-trait prediction accuracy and genetic correlations between end-product and NIR-predicted data (0.69-0.77). Our forward prediction validation revealed a gradual increase in prediction accuracy when adding more years to the multi-trait model. Overall, we achieved genomic prediction accuracy at a level that enables selection for end-product quality traits early in the breeding cycle.

Indexed as

end-product quality traitsforward-predictiongenomic best linear unbiased predictiongenomic predictionmulti-trait modelNIR-predictorwheat breeding

Identifiers

PMID37275257
PMCPMC10233148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.