ArticleFrontiers in physiology2023
A new approach of using organ-on-a-chip and fluid-structure interaction modeling to investigate biomechanical characteristics in tissue-engineered blood vessels.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations to Inform Cancer Therapeutics.Annual review of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Establishing Hemodynamic Convergence Framework for Coronary Digital Twins Under Realistic Dynamic Heart Rates.Physics of fluids (Woodbury, N.Y. : 1994) · 2025Article
- Organ-on-chip platforms for nanoparticle toxicity and efficacy assessment: Advancing beyond traditional in vitro and in vivo models.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Role of biomechanical factors in plaque rupture and erosion: insight from intravascular imaging based computational modeling.NPJ cardiovascular health · 2025Review
- Article
- Integrating computational fluid dynamics into organ-on-chip systems: a glioblastoma-centred design and validation framework.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Endothelial Dysfunction in Atherosclerosis: Experimental Models and Therapeutics.Biomaterials research · 2025Review
- Aerospace medicine in China: advancements and perspectives.NPJ microgravity · 2024Review
- Biocompatibility Testing of UV-Curable Polydimethylsiloxane for Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cell Culture on-a-Chip.ACS omega · 2024Article
- Tiny Organs, Big Impact: How Microfluidic Organ-on-Chip Technology Is Revolutionizing Mucosal Tissues and Vasculature.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Article
- Advances in exercise-induced vascular adaptation: mechanisms, models, and methods.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Microfluidic organ-on-a-chip for modeling coronary artery disease: Recent applications, limitations and potential.Journal of tissue engineeringReview
- Cell culture platform fabrication methods and applications.Tzu chi medical journalReview
- Tissue-engineered blood vessels for clinical translation: Design logic, representative advances and persistent barriers.Journal of tissue engineeringReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The tissue-engineered blood vessel (TEBV) has been developed and used in cardiovascular disease modeling, preclinical drug screening, and for replacement of native diseased arteries. Increasing attention has been paid to biomechanical cues in TEBV and other tissue-engineered organs to better recapitulate the functional properties of the native organs. Currently, computational fluid dynamics models were employed to reveal the hydrodynamics in TEBV-on-a-chip. However, the biomechanical wall stress/strain conditions in the TEBV wall have never been investigated. In this paper, a straight cylindrical TEBV was placed into a polydimethylsiloxane-made microfluidic device to construct the TEBV-on-a-chip. The chip was then perfused with cell culture media flow driven by a peristaltic pump. A three-dimensional fluid-structure interaction (FSI) model was generated to simulate the biomechanical conditions in TEBV and mimic both the dynamic TEBV movement and pulsatile fluid flow. The material stiffness of the TEBV wall was determined by uniaxial tensile testing, while the viscosity of cell culture media was measured using a rheometer. Comparison analysis between the perfusion experiment and FSI model results showed that the average relative error in diameter expansion of TEBV from both approaches was 10.0% in one period. For fluid flow, the average flow velocity over a period was 2.52 cm/s from the FSI model, 10.5% higher than the average velocity of the observed cell clusters (2.28 mm/s) in the experiment. These results demonstrated the facility to apply the FSI modeling approach in TEBV to obtain more comprehensive biomechanical results for investigating mechanical mechanisms of cardiovascular disease development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.