Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37275124›Full record

ArticleResearch (Washington, D.C.)2023

Enzyme Commission Number Prediction and Benchmarking with Hierarchical Dual-core Multitask Learning Framework.

Zhenkun Shi, Rui Deng, Qianqian Yuan, Zhitao Mao, Ruoyu Wang, Haoran Li, Xiaoping Liao, Hongwu Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research (Washington, D.C.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. MTD: A cloud-based omics database and interactive platform forSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. LICEDB: light industrial core enzyme database for industrial applications and AI enzyme design.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2025
    Article
  16. SResearch (Washington, D.C.) · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zhenkun ShiBiodesign Center, Key Laboratory of Engineering Biology for Low-carbon Manufacturing, Tianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 300308, Tianjin, China.
Rui DengBiodesign Center, Key Laboratory of Engineering Biology for Low-carbon Manufacturing, Tianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 300308, Tianjin, China.
Qianqian YuanBiodesign Center, Key Laboratory of Engineering Biology for Low-carbon Manufacturing, Tianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 300308, Tianjin, China.
Zhitao MaoBiodesign Center, Key Laboratory of Engineering Biology for Low-carbon Manufacturing, Tianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 300308, Tianjin, China.
Ruoyu WangBiodesign Center, Key Laboratory of Engineering Biology for Low-carbon Manufacturing, Tianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 300308, Tianjin, China.
Haoran LiBiodesign Center, Key Laboratory of Engineering Biology for Low-carbon Manufacturing, Tianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 300308, Tianjin, China.
Xiaoping LiaoBiodesign Center, Key Laboratory of Engineering Biology for Low-carbon Manufacturing, Tianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 300308, Tianjin, China.
Hongwu MaBiodesign Center, Key Laboratory of Engineering Biology for Low-carbon Manufacturing, Tianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 300308, Tianjin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enzyme commission (EC) numbers, which associate a protein sequence with the biochemical reactions it catalyzes, are essential for the accurate understanding of enzyme functions and cellular metabolism. Many ab initio computational approaches were proposed to predict EC numbers for given input protein sequences. However, the prediction performance (accuracy, recall, and precision), usability, and efficiency of existing methods decreased seriously when dealing with recently discovered proteins, thus still having much room to be improved. Here, we report HDMLF, a hierarchical dual-core multitask learning framework for accurately predicting EC numbers based on novel deep learning techniques. HDMLF is composed of an embedding core and a learning core; the embedding core adopts the latest protein language model for protein sequence embedding, and the learning core conducts the EC number prediction. Specifically, HDMLF is designed on the basis of a gated recurrent unit framework to perform EC number prediction in the multi-objective hierarchy, multitasking manner. Additionally, we introduced an attention layer to optimize the EC prediction and employed a greedy strategy to integrate and fine-tune the final model. Comparative analyses against 4 representative methods demonstrate that HDMLF stably delivers the highest performance, which improves accuracy and F1 score by 60% and 40% over the state of the art, respectively. An additional case study of tyrB predicted to compensate for the loss of aspartate aminotransferase aspC, as reported in a previous experimental study, shows that our model can also be used to uncover the enzyme promiscuity. Finally, we established a web platform, namely, ECRECer (https://ecrecer.biodesign.ac.cn), using an entirely could-based serverless architecture and provided an offline bundle to improve usability.

Identifiers

PMID37275124
PMCPMC10232324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.