ArticleEnvironmental and ecological statistics2019
Estimation and Inference for Upper Hinge Regression Models.
Article in Environmental and ecological statistics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- L-Lysine supplementation affects dietary protein quality and growth and serum amino acid concentrations in rats.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Detection and Kinetics of Subgenomic Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 RNA Viral Load in Longitudinal Diagnostic RNA-Positive Samples.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2022Article
- Change-point analysis of lambda-cyhalothrin efficacy against soybean aphid (Aphis glycines Matsumura): identifying practical resistance from field efficacy trials.Pest management science · 2022Article
- Fast Grid Search and Bootstrap-based Inference for Continuous Two-phase Polynomial Regression Models.Environmetrics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We introduce a new type of threshold regression models called upper hinge models. Under this type of threshold models, there only exists an association between the predictor of interest and the outcome when the predictor is less than some threshold value. Just like hinge models, upper hinge models can be seen as a special case of the more general segmented or two-phase regression models. The importance of studying upper hinge models is that even though they only have one fewer degree of freedom than segmented models, they can be estimated with much greater efficiency. We develop a new fast grid search algorithm to estimate upper hinge linear regression models. The new algorithm reduces the computational complexity of the search algorithm dramatically and renders the existing fast grid search algorithm inadmissible. The fast grid search algorithm makes it feasible to construct bootstrap confidence intervals for upper hinge linear regression models; for upper hinge generalized linear models of non-Gaussian family, we derive asymptotic normality to facilitate construction of model-robust confidence intervals. We perform numerical experiments and illustrate the proposed methods with two real data examples from the ecology literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.