ReviewFrontiers in genetics2023
The Pandora's box of transparency opened by direct-to-consumer genetic testing.
Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Randomized Pilot Trial of the Donor Conception Tool to Empower Parental Telling and Talking (TELL Tool) with Their Children About Their Genetic Origins.Journal of pediatric health care : official publication of National Association of Pediatric Nurse Associates & PractitionersTrial
- Misattributed paternity discovery: A critique of medical organizations' recommendations.American journal of human genetics · 2025Review
- Health equity innovation in precision medicine: data stewardship and agency to expand representation in clinicogenomics.Health research policy and systems · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the increasing use of direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing, several cases of fertility fraud have been uncovered throughout the world. A review of newspaper articles and specialized literature was made to analyze the issue of fertility fraud. The most famous cases, some of which are narrated in this article, became a scandal because they were committed by the doctors who treated the patients in question as a routine procedure in their medical practice. Some have been widely exposed in documentaries on streaming platforms, thereby raising awareness about a grave problem. The discussion focuses on the ambiguous regulation on the anonymity of donors, which has been one of the elements of the deception committed against the families using these services. Anonymity nowadays collides with the fascinating Pandora's box of transparency in genetic information that has been opened by DTC genetic testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.