Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37274722›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Comparing PM

Therese Nitter Moazami, Kristin V Hirsch Svendsen, Morten Buhagen, Rikke Bramming Jørgensen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Cellular responses of human Muller glia exposed to test dust pollution.Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Therese Nitter MoazamiDepartment of Industrial Economics and Technology Management (IØT), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7491, Trondheim, Norway.
Kristin V Hirsch SvendsenDepartment of Industrial Economics and Technology Management (IØT), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7491, Trondheim, Norway.
Morten BuhagenDepartment of Occupational Medicine, St. Olav's University Hospital, 7006, Trondheim, Norway.
Rikke Bramming JørgensenDepartment of Industrial Economics and Technology Management (IØT), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7491, Trondheim, Norway.
Norwegian University of Science and Technology · NOSt Olav's University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using an exposure chamber, we investigate the precision of the DustTrak DRX monitor by comparing its results to those obtained from taking traditional gravimetric samples of two stone minerals commonly used in asphalt and lactose powder. We also discuss the possibility of using real-time monitors such as DustTrak DRX for occupational exposure monitoring purposes. The results are based on 19 days of experiment, each day with measurements collected over 4 h. Compared to the gravimetric samples, the DustTrak DRX overestimated the PM

Indexed as

DustTrak DRXGravimetric samplesOccupational exposureReal-time sensors

Identifiers

PMID37274722
PMCPMC10238574
OpenAlexW4378084496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.