ArticleHeliyon2023
Survival analysis of coagulation disorders: A retrospective study with a 5-year follow-up.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Elderly coagulation risk in a globalized world: burden, biomarkers, and management in Africa - a narrative review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Rare bleeding disorders (RBDs) are the diseases in which patients experience a deficiency of coagulation factors. In the management of these disorders, surveillance is a significant challenge. This study aimed to assess the survival of patients with RBDs in a five-year follow-up. Materials and methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted on 146 patients with RBDs who had referred to Be'sat Hospital of Hamadan, Iran from July 2017 to August 2022. A computerized record search was performed to identify the patients. The surveillance time for a five-year follow-up was assessed with the Kaplan-Meier curve. A log-rank test also served to compare the survival rates according to the type of factor. Results: Out of 146 patients, 117 (80.2%) were males and 29 (19.8%) were females. They were in the range of 2-59 years of age with a mean of 23.11 ± 14.6. The most common disorder was FVIII deficiency (65.8%), and the rarest one was FXIII deficiency (4.8%). The rate of survival for any reason was 54.42 ± 1.3 months. The survival in combined FV and FVIII deficiencies was found to be longer than in the other deficiencies (55.9 ± 5.7), but there was no significant difference (P ≥ 0.05). In contrast, the survival in FXIII deficiency was observed to be lower than the other cases (44 ± 9.6); however, no significant difference was found in this regard (P ≥ 0.05). Conclusion: The results of this study show that patients with RBDs have different rates of survival, which suggests that identifying high-risk patients may be helpful for the improvement of their survival time through timely therapeutic interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.