ReviewIndustrial psychiatry journal
Euthanasia - Review and update through the lens of a psychiatrist.
Review in Industrial psychiatry journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Attitudes of older adults toward active euthanasia in advanced Alzheimer's disease.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2026Article
- Health Professionals' Views on Euthanasia: Impact of Traits, Religiosity, Death Perceptions, and Empathy.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- End of Life in Italy: Ethical and Legal Perspectives.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Mercy killing of a 72-year-old woman through heroin intoxication.Journal of forensic sciences · 2025Article
- Ethics and Medicolegal Aspects of Withdrawal of Treatment in Critical Care Patients without Advanced Directives in India: Who will Guard the Guardians Themselves?Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Euthanasia is not infrequent in the modern practice of medicine. Active euthanasia is legal in seven countries worldwide and passive euthanasia has recently been legalized in India by the Supreme Court. In India, physicians and nurses generally have a favorable attitude towards euthanasia but lack in adequate training to deal with such requests. The role of a psychiatrist is very important in evaluation of request for euthanasia on medical as well as psychiatric grounds. Among patients with end-stage medical illnesses who make a request for euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide, many may have underlying untreated depression. In the complex backdrop of long-term chronic medical illnesses, depression can be very difficult to diagnose and treat. Patients with dementia and other neuropsychiatric illnesses have the issue of consent and capacity. Legalizing euthanasia in these patients can heave dire moral implications. There is clear need of adequate training, formulation of guidelines, and supportive pathway for clarity of clinicians regarding euthanasia in India.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.