ArticleStructural heart : the journal of the Heart Team2022
Patient-Specific Computer Simulation to Predict Conduction Disturbance With Current-Generation Self-Expanding Transcatheter Heart Valves.
Article in Structural heart : the journal of the Heart Team, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Strain-Based Assessment of Post-TAVR Left Bundle Branch Block in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Using Patient-Specific Computational Modeling.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Evolving capabilities of computed tomography imaging for transcatheter valvular heart interventions - new opportunities for precision medicine.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Review
- Predicting procedural outcomes in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a scoping review of numerical patient-specific simulations.Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England) · 2025Article
- Aortic Valve and Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Calcium Distribution and Conduction Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Structural heart : the journal of the Heart Team · 2025Review
- The Virtual Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (VTAVR) framework predicts optimal device landing zones tailored to patient-specific anatomy.npj biomedical innovations · 2025Article
- Conduction Abnormalities after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Incidence, Impact and Management Using CT Data Interpretation.Interventional cardiology (London, England) · 2024Review
- Combining Cell Technologies With Biomimetic Tissue Engineering Applications: A New Paradigm for Translational Cardiovascular Therapies.Stem cells translational medicine · 2023Review
- Editorial: Preprocedural Computational Modeling - One More Step Toward Precision Medicine in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement?Structural heart : the journal of the Heart Team · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patient-specific computer simulation may predict the development of conduction disturbance following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Validation of the computer simulations with current-generation devices has not been undertaken. Methods: A retrospective study was performed on patients who had undergone TAVR with a current-generation self-expanding transcatheter heart valve (THV). Preprocedural computed tomography imaging was used to create finite element models of the aortic root. Procedural contrast angiography was reviewed, and finite element analysis performed using a matching THV device size and implantation depth. A region of interest corresponding to the atrioventricular bundle and proximal left bundle branch was identified. The percentage of this area (contact pressure index [CPI]) and maximum contact pressure (CPMax) exerted by THV were recorded. Postprocedural electrocardiograms were reviewed, and major conduction disturbance was defined as the development of persistent left bundle branch block or high-degree atrioventricular block. Results: A total of 80 patients were included in the study. THVs were 23- to 29-mm Evolut PRO (n = 53) and 34-mm Evolut R (n = 27). Major conduction disturbance occurred in 27 patients (33.8%). CPI (28.3 ± 15.8 vs. 15.6 ± 11.2%; Conclusions: Patient-specific computer simulation may identify patients at risk for conduction disturbance after TAVR with current-generation self-expanding THVs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.