ArticleOncology letters2023
Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment + chemotherapy (vs. chemotherapy alone) for locally advanced non‑small cell lung cancer: A retrospective cohort study.
Article in Oncology letters, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment + chemotherapy has been used for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, evidence regarding the efficacy of this treatment is insufficient, particularly in Chinese patients. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant ICI treatment + chemotherapy compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone for locally advanced NSCLC. For this, 50 patients with locally advanced NSCLC were retrospectively analyzed; of these, 23 patients received pre-operative camrelizumab or sintilimab + chemotherapy (ICI + chemo group) and 27 patients received pre-operative chemotherapy alone (chemo group). The objective response rate (73.9 vs. 44.4%, P=0.035) was superior in the ICI + chemo group compared with the chemo group. Nevertheless, surgical resection rate (100.0 vs. 88.9%, P=0.240), major pathological response (60.9 vs. 41.7%, P=0.188) and complete pathological response (CPR; 30.4 vs. 8.3%, P=0.072) were not significantly different in the ICI + chemo group compared with the chemo group. Following adjustment, ICI + chemo was independently associated with an elevated CPR (P=0.029). Disease-free survival (DFS) was prolonged in the ICI + chemo group compared with the chemo group (1-year DFS, 94.1 vs. 81.6%; 2-year DFS, 80.7 vs. 42.9%; P=0.047), while no significant differences were observed in overall survival (OS; 1-year OS, 100.0 vs. 95.7%; 2-year OS, 90.0 vs. 64.9%; P=0.187). Additionally, the majority of adverse event incidences (apart from leukopenia) did not differ significantly between the ICI + chemo and chemo groups (all P>0.050). On the whole, the present study demonstrated that neoadjuvant ICI treatment + chemotherapy exhibited adequate efficacy and acceptable toxicity compared with chemotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced NSCLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.