ArticleOncology letters2023
Levels of NT‑proBNP in patients with cancer.
Article in Oncology letters, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Venous thromboembolism and bleeding in cancer patients: role of inflammatory and cardiac biomarkers.European heart journal · 2026Trial
- Risk factors for carfilzomib-related cardiovascular adverse events in Chinese patients with multiple myeloma: A real-world retrospective cohort study.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Observational
- Prospective Evaluation of the Cardiovascular Effects of BRAF and MEK Inhibitors in Patients With Melanoma.JACC. CardioOncology · 2025Article
- Anthracycline- and HER2-induced cardiotoxicity: mechanisms, current strategies, and the emerging role of dapagliflozin as a targeted cardioprotective agent.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2025Review
- Evolving tumor microenvironment: Driving cancer initiation and progression in cardiovascular diseases.iScience · 2025Review
- NT-proBNP as a Biomarker in MGUS and Multiple Myeloma: A Retrospective Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Suspected de novo heart failure in outpatient care: the REVOLUTION HF study.European heart journal · 2025Article
- Article
- NT-proBNP for Heart Failure Screening in Primary Care in an Eastern European Country: What We Know and Proposed Steps.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Atrial fibrillation in cancer, anticancer therapies, and underlying mechanisms.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
At present, it is well known that natriuretic peptides may be produced by cancer cells. Stimulation of N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) synthesis may be a reaction to activity of several proinflammatory cytokines. NT-proBNP is also a marker of myocardial damage during cardiotoxic chemotherapy by anthracyclines. The present study aimed to analyze the association between NT-proBNP and patient/disease characteristics in patients without cardiac symptoms. The present clinical study included 112 patients with cancer who were undergoing anticancer therapy between December 2017 and December 2021. From each patient, peripheral blood was obtained for detection of NT-proBNP before any therapy, after therapy and 1 year after the first sample. NT-proBNP was examined using an immunochemical method. The mean ± SEM value of NT-pro-BNP in the first, second and third sample was 561.0±75.1, 1,565.4±461.1 and 1,940.7±581.1 ng/l. A total of 15 (13.4%), 27 (24.1%) and 25 (30.1%) patients had elevated levels of NT-pro-BNP in the first, second and third sample above the normal value adjusted to age. It was observed that NT-proBNP was increased in older patients and in patients with progressive metastatic disease with poor prognosis. Patients with non-elevated NT-proBNP in the second and third sample had significantly improved OS compared with patients with elevated NT-proBNP [hazard ratio (HR), 0.47; 95% CI, 0.26-0.85; P=0.002 for the second sample; and HR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.14-0.60; P=0.0000007, for the third sample]. The baseline NT-proBNP value was not prognostic for OS (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.50-1.92; P=0.96). The present results suggest that the level of NT-proBNP was associated with the extent of oncologic disease. Higher levels were associated with progression of metastatic disease and shorter overall survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.