Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37274448›Full record

Trial reportNeural plasticity2023

Effect of Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Lower Limb Subacute Stroke Rehabilitation.

Qian Duan, Wenying Liu, Jinhui Yang, Ben Huang, Jie Shen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neural plasticity, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06999876 (The Effect of Combined Transcranial Pulse Current Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06999876 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Combined Transcranial Pulse Current Stimulation (tPCS) and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) on Lower Limb Motor Function in Subacute to Chronic Stroke Patients With Hemiplegia: A Double-blind, Sham-controlled, Randomized Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational University Health System, SingaporeRan2025 to 2026Enrolled90ConditionsStroke Patients With Hemiplegia or Hemiparesis in the Subacute StageArmsThe AscenZ-VIII Stimulator (Investigational Medical Device)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Qian DuanDepartment of Rehabilitation, The Eighth People's Hospital of Shanghai, Shanghai 200105, China.ORCID 0009-0001-4189-1538
Wenying LiuDepartment of Rehabilitation, The Eighth People's Hospital of Shanghai, Shanghai 200105, China.
Jinhui YangDepartment of Rehabilitation, Shanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Taiyuan 030012, China.
Ben HuangDepartment of Rehabilitation, The Eighth People's Hospital of Shanghai, Shanghai 200105, China.
Jie ShenDepartment of Rehabilitation, The Eighth People's Hospital of Shanghai, Shanghai 200105, China.ORCID 0009-0001-2076-2382
Shanghai Eighth People Hospital · CNShanxi Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methods: A pilot double-blind and randomized clinical trial. Ninety-one subjects with subacute stroke were treated with cathodal/sham stimulation tDCS based on CGR (physiotherapy 40 min/d and occupational therapy 20 min/d) once daily for 20 consecutive working days. Computer-based stratified randomization (1 : 1) was employed by considering age and sex, with concealed assignments in opaque envelopes to ensure no allocation errors after disclosure at the study's end. Patients were evaluated at T0 before treatment, T1 immediately after the posttreatment assessment, and T2 assessment one month after the end of the treatment. The primary outcome index was assessed: lower limb Fugl-Meyer motor score (FMA-LE); secondary endpoints were other gait assessment and relevant stroke scale assessment. Results: Patients in the trial group performed significantly better than the control group in all primary outcome indicators assessed posttreatment T1 and at follow-up T2: FMA-LE outcome indicators between the two groups in T1 ( Conclusion: In the current pilot study, ctDCS plus CGR was an effective treatment modality to improve lower limb motor function with subacute stroke. The effectiveness of cathodal tDCS in poststroke lower limb motor dysfunction is inconclusive. Therefore, a large randomized controlled trial is needed to verify its effectiveness.

Indexed as

StrokeStroke RehabilitationTranscranial Direct Current StimulationHumansLower ExtremityPilot ProjectsRecovery of FunctionTreatment OutcomeUpper Extremity

Identifiers

PMID37274448
PMCPMC10239296
OpenAlexW4378573746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.