Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37274426›Full record

ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2023

Medication Administration Error Perceptions Among Critical Care Nurses: A Cross-Sectional, Descriptive Study.

Majdi M Alzoubi, Asmaa Al-Mahasneh, Khalid Al-Mugheed, Marwa Al Barmawi, Samira Ahmed Alsenany, Sally Mohammed Farghaly Abdelaliem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Majdi M AlzoubiFaculty of Nursing, Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Asmaa Al-MahasnehFaculty of Nursing, Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Khalid Al-MugheedCollege of Nursing, Riyadh Elm University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-9727-7804
Marwa Al BarmawiFaculty of Nursing, Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Samira Ahmed AlsenanyDepartment of Community Health Nursing, College of Nursing, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Sally Mohammed Farghaly AbdelaliemDepartment of Nursing Management and Education, College of Nursing, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-6497-0952

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the medication administration error perceptions among Jordanian critical care nurses. Methods: A cross-sectional, descriptive design was used among Jordanian critical care nurses. The total number of completed questionnaires submitted for analysis was 340. Data were collected between July and August 2022 in two health sectors (governmental hospitals and educational hospital) in the middle and north region in Jordan through a self-administered questionnaire on medication administration errors which includes 65 items with three parts. Results: Nurses showed negative perceptions toward medication administration errors. The majority of participants agreed that "The packaging of many medications is similar" (76.7%), followed by "different medications look alike" (76.2%), as the main reasons for medication error occurrence. Two thirds of participants agreed that "when med errors occur, nursing administration focuses on the individual rather than looking at the systems as a potential cause of the error" (74.1%). Similarly, 73.5% of them believed nurses were blamed if something happens to the patient as a result of the medication error was the main reason for underreporting of MAEs. The highest reported levels of medication errors were in a range between 41% and 70%, for both types intravenous (IV) medication errors and non-intravenous (non-IV) medication errors. Conclusion: Implement interventions centered on MAEs in particular among critical care nurses, owing to the proven significance of it in foretelling their crucial role in delivering safe care to patients, which will lead to quantifiable returns on both patient outcomes and nurse health, as well as the overall efficiency and image of the organization.

Indexed as

critical care nursesmedication administration errorsperceptionsunderreporting

Identifiers

PMID37274426
PMCPMC10239250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.