Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37274202›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2023

An fMRI study of finger movements in children with and without dyslexia.

Ted K Turesky, Megan M Luetje, Guinevere F Eden

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ted K TureskyCenter for the Study of Learning, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States.
Megan M LuetjeCenter for the Study of Learning, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States.
Guinevere F EdenCenter for the Study of Learning, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States.
Georgetown University · USGeorgetown University Medical Center · US

Funding

Training in Neural Injury &PlasticityT32NS041218 · NINDS · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI MARK P BURNS, Kathleen Anne Maguire-Zeiss · 2001 to 2026
$3.5M
NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS041218
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Developmental dyslexia is a language-based reading disability, yet some have reported motor impairments, usually attributed to cerebellar dysfunction. Methods: Using fMRI, we compared children with and without dyslexia during irregularly paced, left or right-hand finger tapping. Next, we examined seed-to-voxel intrinsic functional connectivity (iFC) using six seed regions of the motor system (left and right anterior lobe of the cerebellum, SM1 and SMA). Results: A whole-brain task-evoked analysis revealed relatively less activation in the group with dyslexia in right anterior cerebellum during right hand tapping. For iFC, we found the group with dyslexia to have greater iFC between the right SM1 seed and a medial aspect of right postcentral gyrus for left hand tapping; and greater iFC between the left SM1 seed and left thalamus, as well as weaker local iFC around the left SM1 seed region for right hand tapping. Lastly, extracted activity and connectivity values that had been identified in these between-group comparisons were not correlated with measures of reading. Discussion: We conclude that there are some aberrations in motor system function in children with dyslexia, but these are not tied to reading ability.

Indexed as

connectivitydyslexiafingermotorreadingreading disability

Identifiers

PMID37274202
PMCPMC10233035
OpenAlexW4377108376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.